this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
637 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
681 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Really interesting read about the history of YouTube adblocking, how the new detection works, how uBO is responding, and how not to block the new popups.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they could just block the alternative frontends. Then we'd need an alternative platform.

[–] nucawysi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

absolutely, the only draw for content creators is the money they can make on youtube, which means people intersted in making money are more likely to use it and their content is obviously biased towards profit building. Any other platform can easily recreate a sane profit sharing program for creators, eventually it might become youtube, but in the meantime we can all enjoy it.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s the next step Google? DRM protected media?

[–] pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't necessarily need DRM to break alternative frontends.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes but it might end there. Google can and will eventually push for DRM, after all they're the ones making the web has DRM...