this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's dogshit

Hamas and Israeli hardliners are two sides of the same coin. The choice is not one hardline faction or the other; it is between fundamentalists and all those who still believe in the possibility of peaceful co-existence. There can be no compromise between Palestinian and Israeli extremists, who must be combatted with a full-throated defense of Palestinian rights that goes hand-in-hand with an unwavering commitment to the fight against anti-Semitism.

Utopian as this may sound, the two struggles are of a piece. We can and should unconditionally support Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorist attacks. But we also must unconditionally sympathize with the truly desperate and hopeless conditions faced by Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied territories. Those who think there is a “contradiction” in this position are the ones who are effectively blocking a solution.

both-sides zizek-theory

We can and should unconditionally defend US slave owners' property rights. But we also must unconditionally sympathize with the truly desperate and hopeless conditions faced by enslaved people.

We can and should unconditionally support Nazi Germany's right to rid itself of undesirables. But we also must unconditionally sympathize with the truly desperate and hopeless conditions faced by those placed in concentration camps.

Feel free to add your own

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Link to the thread if you're going to make accusations like this. I

Why would I bother doing that? You've already decided you haven't done anything wrong; evidence that other people and the mods disagree isn't going to change your mind. The thread in question was literally on the front page for 2 days. Are you gonna admit you caused disquiet among leftist, anti-zionist jews and try to avoid that in the future if I share that with you, or are you just going to double down and insist they were wrong to feel alarmed and start yelling at them? Cause I'm not going to be a party to that.

No I'm not going to walk back my statement because of genocide apologia concern trolling thanks.

Great, but none of that has happened here.

Nothing will change the fact that it's a settler colonial fascist project of ethnic cleansing. Are you seriously going to deny that because CNN told you otherwise?

No one is denying that. Our conversation started because you carelessly called for ethnic cleansing in response to their ethnic cleansing.

Isntreal itself is one giant illegal settlement thank you very much. I was referring to indigenous arab Jews.

Yeah, how many of them live in Gaza?

You haven't responded to the points I laid out in any capacity.

Because your points don't have anything to do with the original conversation. They don't indicate the slightest bit of engagement with what I'm saying. You literally treat "most Israelis are Jewish" and "most of the Jews of the region are Israeli", which are incredibly different in their connotation and implication, but you treat them as interchangeable. How am I supposed to engage with that?

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

evidence that other people and the mods disagree isn't going to change your mind.

This is evidence that you aren't even reading what I've been typing in the typical cracker fashion because I've already addressed this.

The thread in question was literally on the front page for 2 days.

Oh you mean the one where 90% of the comments flamed OP for being a liberal over a bunch of nothing burgers? Yeah now I know which one you're talking about.

Are you gonna admit you caused disquiet among leftist, anti-zionist jews and try to avoid that in the future if I share that with you, or are you just going to double down and insist they were wrong to feel alarmed and start yelling at them?

Bruh you don't get to talk to me in that condescending way you pale-skinned maggot bastard. Yes they are wrong to feel alarmed for identifying with a fascist state, if they were actually "anti-zionist" then they would understand that isntreal is fascist first and foremost before anything.

you carelessly called for ethnic cleansing in response to their ethnic cleansing

"if you want to kill a Nazi to prevent them from murdering you then you are just as bad as them"

lol. lmao even

I've already addressed how it isn't ethnic cleansing to say that the occupants of a fascist settler colonial genocide machine and their supporters need to fuck off from the lands they stole but ok.

cause your points don't have anything to do with the original conversation. They don't indicate the slightest bit of engagement with what I'm saying.

Thats something you decided in your own mind because I've explained multiple times why they do, yet you have never demonstrated otherwise. Its so curious to me why you won't explain why you think being jewish somehow makes a settler population immune to the consequences of stealing land and committing crimes against humanity such that you think that calling for their leaving is "ethnic cleansing".

You literally treat "most Israelis are Jewish" and "most of the Jews of the region are Israeli", which are incredibly different in their connotation and implication

You can put the analytical philosoyphy set theory away because I've already explained, multiple times:

"Most of the Jews in the region are Isntreali" because they are settler colonial imports to further the interests of the fascist non-state of isntreal that have no claim to the land, I repeat, they live on stolen land, therefore, it is not ethnic cleansing to say that all these isntreali bastards should return the stolen land and leave.

"b-b-but a small percentage of the israelis are m'indigenous!!"

This is just being pedantic in bad faith in the vein of "not all men bro" as I explained earlier and you failed to respond to. I'm of the opinion now that even they should fuck off too for proudly identifying with the machine that is performing a genocide of their countrymen. You don't seem to understand the sheer weight of what a genocide means. It isn't something you can just apologize for and then continue with business as usual.

If someone is an isntreali, they are a fascist and the enemy. You don't seem to understand this, because again, you are a white concern troll.

Also if you respond with some soy non argument then I will turn this into a mass struggle session, please be warned.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is just being pedantic in bad faith in the vein of "not all men bro" as I explained earlier and you failed to respond to. I'm of the opinion now that even they should fuck off too for proudly identifying with the machine that is performing a genocide of their countrymen.

"Actually, in retrospect, I am calling for ethnic cleansing of all the jews, even the indigenous ones"

We're not even back to square one, we've gone backwards.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Actually, in retrospect, I am calling for ethnic cleansing of all the jews, even the indigenous ones"

How is it ethnic cleansing to kick out the foreign perpetrators of genocide and land theft from your lands along with their local accomplices? Please answer this question.

"b-but its because they're jewish" No excuses for genocide and land theft.

If you can't answer this question in a straightforward way then I am really going to find that post and calling the site Stasi on your ass. You're literally grasping at straws because you can't fucking respond in a coherent manner to the fact that isntreal is fundamentally a fascist settler colonial ethnostate and a cancer on this earth before anything, they are the enemy.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

along with their local accomplices

Because you construe local accomplices to include anyone identifying as an Israeli, which ae we've agreed, includes almost all the Jews in the region.

You're not kicking them out because they're Jewish, your just kicking out essentially all the Jews based on some other criteria.

That's ethnic cleansing.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

your just kicking out essentially all the Jews based on some other criteria.

some other criteria.

Yeah choosing to identify with and support a fascist settler colonial project currently committing genocide is just meaningless, "some other criteria".

Really showing how little you care about how evil isntreal is.

Being a fascist isnt good, supporting genocide is not good. Just because you're Jewish doesn't somehow make it ok.

includes almost all the Jews in the region

"almost all Jews in the region" are settler colonial imports living on land that is not theirs, why do you want to ignore this fact?

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

almost all Jews in the region" are settler colonial imports living on land that is not theirs, why do you want to ignore this fact?

No one is ignoring this fact. I've even cited demographic numbers in this very conversation with you.

Look if you want to say that essentially all the Jews of Israel need to be expelled, including indigenous ones, go for it, but don't act all surprised when you get accused of advocating for ethnic cleansing, cause ya are when you say things with that effect, even if you think it's justified. If Vietnam had eradicated or expelled the Hmong like many of them feared (enough to flee) for allying with the US, that still would have been ethnic cleansing. Happily, the communists saw no reason to engage in that.

Israel can stops it's genocide, enact a right of return, and transition to a single state Palestine and Israeli under a secular framework with protections for minorities without expelling essentially all it's Jews, and to argue otherwise is to buy into Zionist talking points.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can't even respond to:

"Yeah choosing to identify with and support a fascist settler colonial project currently committing genocide is just meaningless, "some other criteria"."

lol. lmao again. Truly showing how much you have failed to internalize what "genocide" means when its against brown people. Gormless cracker with shit for brains.

Look if you want to say that essentially all the Jews of Israel need to be expelled, including indigenous ones, go for it

I said "all israelis" not "all the jews of israel" you stupid fuck. Identifying with a fascist settler colonial project should indeed have repercussions, jewish or not. You haven't seemed to grasp how fucking evil isntreal is, its just as bad as nazi germany and identifying with it in this day and age should be addressed in the same manner.

Israel can stops it's genocide, enact a right of return, and transition to a single state Palestine and Israeli under a secular framework with protections for minorities without expelling essentially all it's Jews

LIB cope

There is no "and Israeli" and "secular framework", Palestine is a Sunni Muslim country and whether they secularize or not is up to them. A genocidal settler colonial project has no right to continue existing in any form whatsoever. You're basically doing "muh TINA" soft advocacy for the continued existence of a settler colonial project.

to argue otherwise is to buy into Zionist talking points.

"akshually if you think that the settler soyciety shouldn't set the terms and be in control of its own dissolution without its population being forced to give back their homes you're akshually supporting Zionism"

You're a liberal.

If Vietnam had eradicated or expelled the Hmong like many of them feared (enough to flee) for allying with the US, that still would have been ethnic cleansing. Happily, the communists saw no reason to engage in that.

False analogy btw. The genocide that isntreal and the west is doing is more comparable to what the nazis did to eastern europe. And yes, nazi collaborators were fucking shot when the invading force was expelled.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I said "all israelis" not "all the jews of israel" you stupid fuck.

The jews of Israel are a subset of all Israelis how are you still struggling with this basic concept. And you darned sure don't intend to remove the Israeli bedouin population.

You also ran your mouth about Gazan Jews and ignored my follow ups about them when it became clear such a thing doesn't exist in any appreciable numbers, displaying how much you actually know about the subject.

The genocide that isntreal and the west is doing is more comparable to what the nazis did to eastern europe.

If the Don cossocks has been expelled or liquidated in their entirety due to some of them collaborating with the Nazis, that too would be ethnic cleansing, even though Nazis were a fundamentally fascist and genocidal project. The removal of native ethnic Germans from eastern and central Europe following WW2? Ethnic cleansing.

This isn't hard stuff. You don't get to remove entire groups of people for state crimes against humanity without carefully and specifically evaluating complicity in those crimes. Otherwise you're ethnic cleansing.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The jews of Israel are a subset of all Israelis how are you still struggling with this basic concept.

Israelis are settler colonial demons that need to be kicked out, and being jewish doesnt mean you can occupy stolen land and aid in ethnic cleansing without consequence, how are you still struggling with these basic concepts?

when it became clear such a thing doesn't exist in any appreciable numbers

Ok so its "non appreciable numbers" when the oppressed population has Jews lmao you bloodthirsty racist fuck.

Don cossocks has been expelled or liquidated in their entirety due to some of them collaborating with the Nazis,

Here's the thing, all Isntreali citizens are fascist collaborators in genocide like how all Nazis were fascists for identifying with a genocidal state. Isntreal is a fundamentally fascist state, isntreali is not an ethnicity just like how nazi isnt. Saying otherwise is a lie constructed by the liberal mainstream media.

The Don Cumsocks on the other hand are an ethnic group that existed from before the Nazis, so expelling them all would be, in fact, ethnic cleansing, because "Don Cossack" is an ethnicity and does not imply that all of them are fascists.

AS SUCH: Nobody is saying that all Jews should be kicked out of the region because some of them are isntreali, the line is that all self-identifying israelis should be kicked out and/or face some sort of justice because they are all fascist settler colonists, Jewish or not. There is no excuse for genocide.

Get that through your empty white brainpan will you? Dumb fucking cracker. Its almost like you're paid not to understand the words you see on your screen.

And you darned sure don't intend to remove the Israeli bedouin population.

When have I given any indication that I thought that? JFL that is such an absurd thing to say, grasping at 100 straws for a gotcha.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Israelis are settler colonial demons that need to be kicked out

Some of them; as we've gone round and round, then are indigenous jews, bedouin, christains, druze, and circassians who are

  1. All Israeli citizens, and largely 'identify as Israeli' in addition to their ethnic affiliation.
  2. Not settler colonial demons that need to be kicked out.

If we can agree on that, (and thus on the ill-advisedness of shouting 'ALL ISRAELI'S MUST GO"), I think we can wrap up here.

Here's the thing, all Isntreali citizens are fascist collaborators in genocide like how all Nazis were fascists for identifying with a genocidal state.

Absolute nonsense. Israeli citizenship is conferred automatically by birth in many cases, and someone acknowledging that reality is not remotely analogous to taking the steps to affirmatively join a genocidal political party. Thousands of Israeli citizens are anti-zionist activists.

Nobody is saying that all Jews should be kicked out of the region because some of them are isntreali,

They're all Israeli. I ask again; what's the population of Gazan Jews or even non-settlement Jews in the West Bank? If you're kicking out all Israeli's you're kicking out all the jews (or, as is what happening in your case, using some absolutely galaxy-brained definition of 'Israeli' that changes on the fly to accommodate your argument.)

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If we can agree on that, (and thus on the ill-advisedness of shouting 'ALL ISRAELI'S MUST GO"), I think we can wrap up here.

Ok see this is it, you don't seem to understand what "isntreali" means. The entire so called "country" of isntreal is built on stolen land and mass killings.

It is a genocidal settler colonial project. Anyone who willingly identifies with it is a fucking scumbag, just like how anyone who identifies as a nazi should be punched at the very least. We've only gone "round and round" because the true nature of isntreal's existence is the fucking point you fail to fucking address.

That Isntreal itself is a fascist genocidal project of pure, fucking, evil. Before anything else. It is not a real country, nor a real ethnicity. It doesn't even have a proper unifying culture beyond genocide.

Therefore, this is just like being a bad faith pedant whenever someone says "death to america" or "plz Xi nuke the shit out of america to kill them all" by saying: "but askhaullyalslajsldalyy there are still native indigenous people there who identify as americans so thats muh ethnic cleansing", completely failing to realize that when you refer to a fascist settler colonial state by name you are referring to the settler population first and foremost. Its already baked into the name itself, because the name refers to the project of utter violence.

"b-b-but muh mass media definition!"

Do you fucking trust the mass media for anything? This is fucking hexbear.net, I don't need to be PC about this shit because I can make the assumption that we are all operating off a common skepticism of mainstream narratives and an understanding of what is truly going on. Because the truth is that Israel isnt real beyond a settler colonial project of utter genocide against Palestine.

And IF individuals and political groups from the populations you listed are patriotic isntreali citizens, then they also need to face some sort of justice like how the fucking Nazi collaborators did and still would if the world was a better place.

All in all this is just an issue of you being a braindead cracker who watches too much CNN and accidentally internalized their worldview, specifically about isntreal ackshually being real.

Israeli citizenship is conferred automatically by birth in many cases, and someone acknowledging that reality is not remotely analogous to taking the steps to affirmatively join a genocidal political party. Thousands of Israeli citizens are anti-zionist activists.

"Absolute nonsense. Nazi citizenship is conferred automatically by birth in many cases, and someone acknowledging that reality is not remotely analogous to taking the steps to affirmatively join a genocidal political party." If you know what your "country" did and still don't renounce your citizenship then that doesn't make you less of a monster. I don't care if they virtue signal about not being Zionists, the very fact that they self-identify as "Isntreali" is a fucking crime against humanity. There are populations of Jews living in occupied Palestine (isntreal) who dont even acknowledge isntreal as their motherland and instead identify as Palestinian.

If you're kicking out all Israeli's you're kicking out all the jews

You fail to acknowledge that being jewish is no excuse for identifying with a settler colonial death machine.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

the truth is that Israel isnt real

There's the materialism we know and love.

Look if you had just said you'd like for me to join you in a ontological flight of fancy where words lose all common language meaning and become pliable as rubber I could have politely declined and we could have saved all this trouble.

Down here, Israel is a materially-extant and internationally-recognized state that is currently genociding the Palestinian people, and 'Israeli' refers to a citizen of Israel.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

common language meaning

Appeal to common sense btw. Just because most westerners believe propaganda doesn't mean reality is automatically rewritten.

Down here, Israel materially-extant and internationally-recognized nation that is currently genociding the Palestinian people, and 'Israeli' refers to a citizen of Israel.

Yeah down here in your ass where you have so thoroughly shoved your head, you fucking stupid condescending white piece of rotten elephant shit. You cant appeal to materialism and whatever narrative the state department has been shitting out for 80 years to manufacture consent for a genocide at the same time. Its fucking ridiculous.

The material reality on the fucking ground is that Isntreal is a settler colonial project of mass murder and genocide. Its entire existence would crumble if not for foreign direct investment and "lethal aid", how the hell can you call that a materially-extent "nation". Yes it is something, but it is not a nation with a culture beyond settler colonialism and the ethnic cleansing that follows. You're a idiot who constantly fails to acknowledge this because you have a liberal chauvinist worldview.

that is currently genociding the Palestinian people, and 'Israeli' refers to a citizen of Israel.

Isntreal in itself *is the genocide. How can you not fucking understand this?? It has no purpose in this world other than to enact a project of ethnic cleansing and be the west's regional puppet, absolutely fucking none.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Appeal to common sense btw. Just because most westerners believe propaganda doesn't mean reality is automatically rewritten.

Nope, it's alluding to the more formalized notion of plain meaning rule , which I take, in conjunction with the cooperative principle of communication . You're using essentially bespoke definitions of 'Israeli' and getting angry that anyone might read the plain meaning of 'Israeli' instead.

how the hell can you call that a materially extent nation.

The plain meaning of 'state', again. Which is what I should have said originally, but I'll go back and fix that.

Isntreal in itself *is the genocide.

The genocide is the genocide, as in, the set of actions by the Israeli government that result in the expulsion, privation, immiseration and death of the local Palestinian population.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

alluding to the more formalized notion of plain meaning rule

So you're in law school then, explains a lot. We aren't discussing Statutes though so I'm sorry but this is meaningless drivel pulled from your educational background to win an argument where you deny the origin of a genocide. You referred to a "commonsense" liberal understanding of the word "isntreal", not its statutory definition in the american legal system you stupid libshit.

miyazaki-laugh

The plain meaning of 'state', again.

"There is no academic consensus on the definition of the state."

miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh

The genocide is the genocide, as in, the set of actions by the Israeli government that result in the expulsion, privation, immiseration and death of the local Palestinian population.

LMFAOOOOO holy fucking shit you're actually trying to speak legalese in this discussion, bloody hilarious.

I'm not sure whether they taught you this in law school but Isntreal was created by the west to be a settler colonial puppet state to assert power in the region and enact a manifest destiny type genocide against Palestinians. It isn't that it was innocently created and then somehow turned evil, its very nature, an "original sin" if you like, is to be a racist project of mass murder. To place it on Palestinian land without consent of the indigenous population such that it could steal land and expand was indeed a genocidal act. Its existence necessitates stolen land and therefore is fundamentally genocidal.

You're a funny man son, I hope you dont become a corrupt lawyer in the future.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So you're in law school then

Nope!

We aren't discussing Statutes though so I'm sorry but this is meaningless drivel

We are not discussing statues, but as I pointed out, such notions aren't limited to statutory interpretation, as seen by the cooperative principle of communications advice on the avoidance of ambiguity. If you're not saying things with a goal toward being understood, that's fine, feel free to flout that.

win an argument where you deny the origin of a genocide.

There's no winning an argument. I'm trying to help you understand why your original comment was removed as an accidental call for ethnic cleansing. Obviously I'm failing at that goal but this isn't some debate where I'm trying to score goals with some audience. This thread is a week old, no one else is here.

"There is no academic consensus on the definition of the state."

Sure, there is no academic consensus on the intension of state, but the concept is still used, and Israel is universally considered to be within the extension of the definiens state in the academic community, in the general public, and by 85% of the government in the UN.

then somehow turned evil, its very nature, an "original sin" if you like, is to be a racist project of mass murder.

The problem with Israeli is the act of mass murder and ethnic cleansing, not some ontological evil essence nonsense. Stop the mass murder, reverse the ethnic cleansing, and peacefully integrate into the local polity and woohoo, it's party time. Pieds-noir were allowed to remain in Algeria, even if most of the opted not to., White's in South Africa and Rhodesia, White Poles in Haiti, the list goes on.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope!

Go and open an account on lesswrong then, you have such amazing potential to be among the greatest minds.

but as I pointed out, such notions aren't limited to statutory interpretation, as the cooperative principle of communications advise on the avoidance of ambiguity. If you're not saying things with a goal toward being understood, that's fine.

Least pretentious redditor. Its still an appeal to commonsense to insist on a liberal worldview as being the "unambiguous" way to understand Isntreal.

I'm trying to help you understand why your original comment was removed as an accidental call for ethnic cleansing. Obviously I'm failing at that goal but this isn't some debate where I'm trying to score goals with some audience.

I don't care why it was removed, I have already accepted that and moved on with my life, go mods.

What I don't accept is that you keep insisting that its actually ethnic cleansing advocacy when it clearly isn't.

Israel is universally considered to be within the extension of state in the academic community, in the general public, and by 85% of the government in the UN.

....But not on hexbear.net where we all know that it isn't real.

In terms of "the academic community and the general public" that really depends on which country you are referring to. Of course in the west the public recognizes isntreal as legitimate because of propaganda and brainwashing, like how everyone supports capitalism. However, I doubt the "academic community" and "general public" in Palestine recognize the validity of the cancer currently resting on their stolen lands. Fuck the UN in particular because they created this entire mess in the first place.

The problem with Israeli is the act of mass murder and ethnic cleansing, not some ontological evil essence nonsense.

"Bro ackshualalflasflasflsaflly isntreal wasnt in fact created with the express purpose of being a genocidal settler state thats just ontological evil essence nonsense bro."

The problem with isntreal is that it is a settler colonial project whose very creation and continued existence was/is contingent on mass murder and ethnic cleansing. They have literally no right to exist. Why do you fail to acknowledge this?

This thread is a week old, no one else is here.

I've already reported some of the shit you said to our mods btw they will be here soon. If they don't come then I will call our most terminally online users and dogpile your yudowsky-lite ass for Zionism apologia.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't care why it was removed, I have already accepted that and moved on with my life, go mods.

Then what are we talking about?

What I don't accept is that you keep insisting that its actually ethnic cleansing advocacy when it clearly isn't.

It was understood to be, by several people. Once again you're doing this essentialist ontology stuff instead of looking at the actual effects of certain things.

They have literally no right to exist. Why do you fail to acknowledge this?

Because 'right to exist' is metaphysical drivel. They do exist and are currently genociding the Palestinians, and they should stop.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then what are we talking about?

What I don't accept is that you keep insisting that its actually ethnic cleansing advocacy when it clearly isn't.

You answered your own question.

It was understood to be.

Why do I care? Just because someone has a shit understanding doesn't mean its reality.

essentialist ontology stuff instead of looking at the actual effects of certain things.

If I make some idiot craps their pants because they have a liberal worldview that shouldn't be my problem, especially not on this site where I thought we all shared the same leftist worldview that settler colonial soycieties necessitate utter destruction in their nascent form or else there will be massive, tragic genocide like what happened to the native americans, what could have happened to all of eastern europe, and what is currently happening in what remains of sovereign Palestine.

I understand why it could be interpreted in bad faith based on a soy rewriting of history using a lib worldview but thats not my problem in this situation. I now understand that its another argument in the arsenal of zionist apologia that the liberals have.

They do exist and are currently geocoding the Palestinians, and they should stop.

My son, the existence of Isntreal itself is a genocide. Look at the map I shared earlier, you cant just go to another country and tell the inhabitants "ok guys im going to start an ethnostate here, move or i kill you". Its fucking settler colonialism, isntreal needs to be destroyed for the genocide to "stop".

Because 'right to exist' is metaphysical drivel.

LMAO so Palestine is Terra Nullis like how "Australia" was?

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just because someone has a shit understanding doesn't mean its reality.

Haha, clearly.

I understand why it could be interpreted in bad faith based on a soy rewriting of history using a lib worldview but thats not my problem in this situation.

I've extended nothing but good faith in this conversation, I know that you don't intend to convey a call for ethnic cleansing and have stated that multiple times. The fact that other users and mods read it with some genuine concern is also not an indication of bad faith, as the hallmark of bad faith is insincerity.

LMAO so Palestine is Terra Nullis like how "Australia" was?

No? That hasn't gotten anything to do with pointing out that 'right to exist' and 'actual existence' are entirely separate concepts, with a 'right to exist' being literally immaterial. Israel has no right to exist, no legitimate claim to existence, nothing like any of that, and yet exists all the same and leverages that existence to continue to genocide the Palestinians. You're doing this "Israel isn't real bro it can't hurt you" schtick, as it in fact, continues to hurt lots of people.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hurr no you're the one with no grip on reality because you dont follow the CNN line!

Ok keep denying a genocide then.

I've extended nothing but good faith in this conversation

I've already demonstrated that you haven't engaged with over 90% of what I wrote because you're a candidate for lesswrong's membership. Like how you just ignored what I wrote about isntreal being fundamentally genocidal, akin to america and nazi germany, due to the material necessities of its birth and continued existence. I was not born yesterday moron.

The fact that other users and mods read it with some genuine concern is also not an indication of bad faith, as the hallmark of bad faith is insincerity.

Its still a bad faith interpretation that denies a historical understanding of isntreal and its creation as a settler colonial project of genocide. Do you actually fucking deny that isntreal is a settler colonial, genocidal project?

You're doing this "Israel isn't real bro it can't hurt you" schtick, as it in fact, continues to hurt lots of people.

Are you stupid? Israel isnt real because it has no legitimacy as a state, its one giant administrative region for a slaughterhouse of human beings. That is what it means to be a settler colonial project. Of course it fucking hurts people but that doesn't mean it should be recognized as a sovereign nation, because that would mean you imply that genocide is a valid way of establishing a state and that Palestinians lost the land fair and square. I don't care if the whole world supports Isntreal, I still support Palestine and its view of their oppressors as an illegitimate cancer on land that is rightfully theirs.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Me: They do exist and are currently genociding the Palestinians

You: Keep denying genocide then

I've already demonstrated that you haven't engaged with over 90% of what I wrote

We're both tugging at selective threads of the conversation based on our goals for it, cause I'm still waiting on that census data of Gazan jews from you.

Like how you just ignored what I wrote about isntreal being fundamentally genocidal

I didn't ignore it, I dismissed it as metaphysical drivel attempt to distill some 'essence' of Israel.

Its still a bad faith interpretation that denies a historical understanding

That's not what bad faith means. That's just being wrong.

Do you actually fucking deny that isntreal is a settler colonial, genocidal project?

I've probably said 15 times that Israeli has consistently engaged in settler-colonialism and genocide, and that such settler-colonialism and genocide even predated the establishment of the state of Israel.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

selective threads of the conversation

You're conveniently ignoring my main point but ok.

I dismissed it as metaphysical drivel attempt to distill some 'essence' of Israel.

Im not making any soy claims about the "essence" of Isntreal. The fucking material reality on the ground is that it could not have existed without a massive genocide. The very notion of "israel" necessitates land stolen and people removed from Palestine. Just like america and nazi germany before it. This is why it needs to be destroyed. Its a deeply unjust situation and im fucking shocked that you think that mass loss of life and land theft to create an ethnostate is "metaphysical drivel".

That's not what bad faith means. That's just being wrong.

The individual was not operating in "bad faith" but the argument is a bad faith argument due to its dishonest presuppositions rooted in Zionist apologia.

Israeli has consistently engaged in settler-colonialism and genocide

Because they are a settler colonial project, not a proper nation. You don't get it, the creation of Isntreal itself was an act of settler-colonialism and genocide.

As I said:

"Of course it fucking hurts people but that doesn't mean it should be recognized as a sovereign nation, because that would mean you imply that genocide is a valid way of establishing a state that shouldnt immediately be militarily opposed by every country on the planet if they had a sense of justice. I don't care if the whole world supports Isntreal, I still support Palestine and its view of their oppressors as an illegitimate cancer on land that is rightfully theirs."

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're conveniently ignoring my main point but ok.

Your main point to me seems to be that 'Israeli' should be understood to mean 'settler' before anything else. I've expressed at length that this runs the risk of being interpreted in an alarming fashion, and for a little more effort, this can be avoided. You don't seem to care about that. Which sure, that's fine.

Is that not your main point?

Im not making any soy claims about the "essence" of Isntreal.

Well then don't use phrases like 'original sin'

Original sin is the Christian doctrine that holds that humans, through the fact of birth, inherit a tainted nature with a proclivity to sinful conduct in need of regeneration.

im fucking shocked that you think that mass loss of life and land theft to create an ethnostate is "metaphysical drivel".

I don't, I've accurately described those actions as genocide, repeatedly.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't

v.s.

"I dismissed it as metaphysical drivel attempt to distill some 'essence' of Nazi Germany as fundamentally genocidal".

Pick one you smug liberal piece of dog shit.

Your main point to me seems to be that 'Israeli' should be understood to mean 'settler' before anything else.

And that isntreal itself is a cancer on the world that needs to be treated with the same military and cultural response that nazi germany did in the 20th century.

*also it isn't "should be" but "is", this is an important distinction because I don't recognize it as a sovereign state since this implies a dismissal of Palestine's sovereignty and a~~n acceptance~~ dismissal of their genocide /*as a natural state of affairs

Well then don't use phrases like 'original sin'

I fucking know what it means you pedantic cuck. I thought it would be a convenient shorthand as a way of conveying the material nature of isntreal's creation and existence but nvm.

runs the risk of being interpreted in an alarming fashion,

By people with a liberal worldview who I would have never thought to encounter as users of this site but that was clearly a wrong assumption.

and for a little more effort, this can be avoided

"All israelis must leave" is fucking crystal clear because it the literal reality on the ground that israel is a settler colonial project that is in the same vein as nazi germany and america before it. If people have a stupid liberal worldview then fuck them I don't care. 90% of the site agrees with me and thought OP was an idiot.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's no contradiction to pick through. Nazi Germany can and was opposed without having to sift through the metaphysical fluff of whether or not they 'happened to be' or 'must have been' evil genocidal maniacs. And further, neither you nor I believe that the US and Britain opposed Nazi Germany because it was "ontologically evil". Their concerns and opposition were pragmatic. Heck, even the KPD offered pragmatic support for the German Nazi party in one of the biggest accelerationist self-owns in history.

90% of the site agrees with me and thought OP was an idiot.

No one believed that anyone had made any ethnic cleansing calls, and when I linked to yours as an example. Everyone's response was 'oh yeah, you gotta report that shit', and it was deleted as a [accidental] call for ethnic cleansing.

Palestine's sovereignty and an acceptance dismissal of their genocide /*as a natural state of affairs

Natural state of affairs? Nonsense. Actual state of affairs, as in the state of Israel is using state apparatus to actually genocide actual Palestinians? Undeniable.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nazi Germany can and was opposed without having to sift through the metaphysical fluff of whether or not they 'happened to be' or 'must have been' evil genocidal maniacs.

Because they literally were??? Like fucking Isntreal??? *I dont see why you say that calling a spade a spade is "metaphysical fluff" like cmon, its fucking undeniably evil to commit genocide.

And further, neither you nor I believe that the US and Britain opposed Nazi Germany because it was "ontologically evil". Their concerns and opposition were pragmatic.

I was referring to the people of the Soviet Union and its neighbors opposing it because it was an evil cancer eating their lands and killing their people in concentration camps.

Everyone's response was 'oh yeah, you gotta report that shit', and it was deleted as a [accidental] call for ethnic cleansing.

Everyone's response was 'oh yeah, you gotta report that shit',

Everyone's response

miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh

Stupid, stupid rat bastard.

Natural state of affairs? Nonsense.

If you acknowledge the statehood of isntreal then you imply that invading another sovereign country with a foreign force to commit genocide and land theft is a valid way to create a nation.

You're like one of those pretentious wannabe academic types who thinks that using a bunch of random factoids to unintentionally run "muh nuance" apologetics for the status quo is being smart.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

its fucking undeniably evil to commit genocide.

Yes, clearly, but notice that we're talking about the evilness of actions, not attributes or essences.

it was an evil cancer eating their lands and killing their people in concentration camps.

Yes, it was evil because of what it did, not because of some essence of it.

Let's not pretend that everyone agreed with you, and let's further note that all the examples you cite are more careful than you, calling for the expulsions of settlers, not all Israelis.

valid

It's not a valid way to create a state, but it is an actual way to create a state, it is how Israel was created, and pretending Israel doesn't exist doesn't do anything to prevent Israel from acting in a state's capacity.

pretentious wannabe academic types

I do have bad news for you on that front.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do have bad news for you on that front.

Are you already an academic? Feel bad for your students bud, to have a liberal as their teacher. I hope they all submit their work 9 seconds before the deadline so you have to speed grade it lmao

Yes, clearly, but notice that we're talking about the evilness of actions, not attributes or essences.

The action of creating isntreal was the displacement and genocide of Palestinians. Your argument is still invalid.

Also, observe how,

"and when I linked to yours as an example. Everyone's response was"

Transitions to:

Let's not pretend that everyone agreed with you, and let's further note that all the examples you cite are more careful than you, calling for the expulsions of settlers, not all Israelis.

"w-well according to a source that is different to the one I was referring to originally!"

miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh miyazaki-laugh

6 likes on 1st image shilling for UN definition.

28 likes on expected social balancing response post to the original mocking of OP.

Guy on 3rd image (same as image 1) got fucked in the comments immediately after.

4th image has 18 likes without even having seen the comment.

*I mean even without addressing these images you are a fool who didnt check what people actually said to you when you made that post which you referred to as a gotcha just now lmao

5th image hadnt even read my post either and assumed it was someone literally going "HURRR muh TKD!!111!!11"

6th image is mod doing their job at addressing community needs, i dont question their authority.

pretending Israel doesn't exist

Youre a total idiot who thinks "israel isnt real" literally means that isntreal doesnt exist and is just an imaginary phenomenon. No, as I explained before, it literally means it has no legitimacy as a state and must be destroyed.

but it is an actual way to create a state, it is how Israel was created

Sorry this is where we disagree, I don't recognize the legitimacy of its statehood because doing so would be to recognize that it has claims to lands that it stole by genociding the people living there. This is wrong and unjust.

I recognize that "israel" refers to something, and that something is an invading force of settler occupiers who run a human slaughterhouse. Its a settler colonial society at its core with all of its systems of power geared towards the genocide of Palestine to steal land. Just like how a gun is designed to shoot bullets, Isntreal is designed to kill Palestinians.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The action of creating isntreal was the displacement and genocide of Palestinians. Your argument is still invalid.

No, this displacement and genocide preceded the incorporation of the state of Israel as a political entity, continues currently, and could extend beyond it's existence if there were a devolution into the local communes.

I don't recognize the legitimacy of its statehood because doing so would be to recognize that it has claims to lands that it stole by genociding the people living there. This is wrong and unjust.

I don't recognize the legitimacy of it's statehood because getting hung up on legitimacy is metaphysical drivel. Israel makes and exercises claims to stolen land, legitimate or not. This act of stealing the land and holding it from the indigenous population is to be opposed regardless of what intellectual or legal framework can be roped around it to 'legitimize' it. Talk of Israel's 'right to defend itself' is metaphysical drivel attempting to legitimate genocide.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, this displacement and genocide preceded the incorporation of the state of Israel as a political entity, continues currently, and could extend beyond it's existence if there were a devolution into the local communes.

No? Lot of words to say absolutely nothing but unintentional Zionist apologia. "Hurr our country is ok bcuz the region already had a genocide!!!!"

The act of creating isntreal necessitated the conquest of Palestine by Britain and the forceful settlement of Palestinian land.

*And "this displacement and genocide preceded the incorporation of the state of Isntreal" is a stupid thing to say because its literally saying "bro the map was green from the beginning in the early 20th century!" As if the genocide was going to happen anyways and then Isntreal was just created by accident lmao

This act of stealing the land and holding it from the indigenous population is to be opposed regardless of what intellectual or legal framework can be roped around it to 'legitimize' it.

Literally what I said but ok. "B-bbbubt akshualasflaslfy you-ACK" its not an "intellectual" or "legal" argument to say that its wrong and unjust to genocide a population.

Talk of Israel's 'right to defend itself' is metaphysical drivel attempting to legitimate genocide.

So is talk of "Israel's" "right to exist" because a settler colonial state that is only there to steal land and commits genocide must be destroyed no matter what.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should point out, by way of humorist aside, that I'm actually a neo-pragmatist non-realist, so in a very real sense the 'reality' of any given concept is not a question I'm interested in.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can tell, I could hear you wanking all the way from america.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Only on Saturday mon frère.