this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
524 points (86.9% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 182 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Wasn't like... a huge deal made about how the Teslas are so waterproof they could double as a boat? I mean they can in fact ford much deeper than ICE cars because they don't need air, but also there's definitely tweets about this.

Edit: he said it about both the cybertruck - loads of stories about this - and the model S: https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a21421/elon-musk-model-s-boat/

This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world. Precedent for manufacturers taking responsibility for bad products was first established in Britain centuries ago.

[–] Krotiuz@kbin.social 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And not to mention it was water ingress into the bloody batteries, they're lucky (or maybe unlucky in this case) that the car didn't burn down from the Lithium...

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 46 points 1 year ago

Yeah... that's the one part you need to waterproof, more even than the passenger cabin. Everything else except the ECU is water-agnostic. Those battery cells will discharge and die if you leave them submerged. The pack itself is fine for short spells under water if it is properly made.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world.

Two things here...

The source of this is ...The Mirror. Not exactly top shelf journalism. They thrive of outage, just like the Daily Fail. Keep that in mind when reading these trash sources.

I suspect the owner of the vehicle did a lot more than "drive it in a bit of rain" and is simply lying about it in order to try and get bailed out. Funnily enough I've not seen a queue of Tesla's broken down every time I drive in the rain.

It's certainly possible that the owner is telling the truth. But I doubt it. I doubt it a lot.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've recovered Teslas that have "failed" in the rain. It means a moisture sensor has triggered. The car tells you they it can get to where you need to go but then will need to be serviced. It's a "first" generation problem rather than anything inherently wrong with electric cars.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It means a moisture sensor has triggered.

Moisture sensors don't typically cost $21k. They said the batteries were full of water.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They said the batteries were full of water

I think we can assume the moisture sensor was triggered then.

[–] Heggico@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which is the part I don't really understand. Aren't these batteries pretty much all watercooled? Maybe the control electronics got wet causing it to keep the battery on in a flooded condition and thus draining them completely? Maybe just the moisture senser tripped, causing them to say, yeah, water damage, gotta replace it?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue is the statement by the Tesla rep that bad weather was the cause. Now we don't have any confirmation they said that, but it would take nothing for Tesla to categorically deny that that is an acceptable reason to deny warranty, and state that any rep saying that was at fault. There. Done. Non-story.

If they can't categorically deny that then that implies they actually are employing this excuse for their shoddy workmanship. It certainly wouldn't be the scummiest thing the company has done.

[–] steakmeout@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What statement? What you read was not a statement but hearsay in the form of a vaguely retold exchange.

Fuck Elon and Tesla but this isn't much to go on.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They got a statement from Tesla who said they were "investigating". You don't need to investigate to know that this is a bullshit reason to give, and their silence on that issue speaks volumes. Now, if the statements by the customers were not given to the Tesla rep to respond to, they would have ample opportunity to put out a statement explaining the problems with the article. Have they done that, or is it just silence? Any media rep worth their salt is absolutely going to be aware of this article.

[–] soupspoon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scotland is having some pretty extreme weather now, though

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unless a tree fell on the car it shouldn't stop running because of some wind & rain. This is basic stuff, I don't know why people don't get this.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

"Some wind and rain". The Edinburgh and Cannonmill area, where this story is from, has had at least two floods this month severe enough to submerge parked vehicles.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Rain kills cars literally all the time when idiots drive them through flooded roads.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Have you not heard of flooding?

This is basic stuff, I don't know why people don't get this.

Perhaps it's the other way around?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I know someone who had to get their Tesla repaired after driving in a puddle. I don't know the size or depth of the puddle though.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is not as easy, I mean they're are some things that makes it easier than ICE, but electronical components also cannot get wet and those big boats run on fossil fuel after all.

But what's ridiculous is that rain could damage it (from article doesn't sound like car was flooded, as that would be understandable).

Yesterday I saw comment: imagine that the typical home printer was your car. That's the experience of typical Tesla owner.

This seems to match the article.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except most BEVs absolutely can ford shallow rivers. They're better at it than ICE cars because of the intake issue.

And the electronics on any vehicle needs to be water proof too. Although I've seen an iffroad tesla mod where they actually said that opening holes in the bottom of the ECU waterproofing was essential to allow water to flow out, rather than sealing it up completely like Tesla had done. That was the problem that killed their first motherboard in that project.

Also note there's a difference between electronics and electrics. The electric motors dgaf about water, they work flooded or dry. The logic circuits are the really vulnerable part.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yesterday I saw comment: imagine that the typical home printer was your car. That’s the experience of typical Tesla owner.

Can you expand? I live in a wealthy liberal area, the cross section of people who want to show their wealth with fancy cars and also want to virtue signal that they care about the environment, so there are a bunch of Teslas around here. I also have a few close friends and family that have them. I've heard overwhelmingly good things about the cars from these people. All of the complaints have been minor quibbles.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tesla owners down play it, but basically every study/survey agrees that Tesla has terrible reliability. It's not just the electric car parts, it's everything. You can call it minor that door handles stick, or windows break, loss of power steering, leaking moon roofs, touch screens being non-responsive, and more.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Those studies usually fail to account for the ease of service with Tesla. You can schedule service from the app and most of the time they will send a mobile technician to you at home or at work or wherever you want to service the vehicle, so people are more likely to schedule appointments for minor issues.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think Elon tweeted something about the cyber truck being water proof enough to be used as a boat once, I don't know if anything was said about the rest of their cars.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I looked it up, it was the truck and the model S, he's said it multiple times, because the man cannot understand when to stfu: https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a21421/elon-musk-model-s-boat/

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Cool good to know, I saw a model 3 in a home Depot parking lot recently when it was raining and it looked like the driver was having all kinds of issues with their car. I kind of wonder if it was the same thing.

[–] flying_monkies@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're correct, it was the truck

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Every car can "briefly" serve as a boat.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Yeah it’s Lemon Law, it exists in many places

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_law

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago