393
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I always find it funny how hung up the media class has been on Keshoggi. Its a fairly intense bit of class solidarity I suppose. Like in terms of pointless and evil acts of the Saudi Arabia state it doesn't even rank but its seemingly the only thing journalists remember

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meanwhile all those dead Yemenis don't even warrant a mention, especially since it might have people asking why we were over there helping kill them in the first place

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I saw a single decent report on Yemen and it was on pbs in like 2014 or 2015 maybe. It showed how the Saudis are bombing the shit out of them with ordinance made in the USA and all the starving children dying because of the blockade on any asstancd getting to them.

I haven't seen any comparable coverage since.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The war in Yemen had very little coverage in the West. People are talking about all the drones being used in Ukraine, but they'd been using drones with similar devastating effecet in Yemen - the main difference being they tended to target people rather than tanks.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

See, Yemen is a bad place where bad things are allowed to happen. By Western logic stuff only becomes real if it enters our imaginary bubble of perpetual safety. That's also why 9/11 and the Ukraine invasion got such a big reaction.

To be clear, the bubble is not real, it can all happen here.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

it's just very memorable and visceral how it was carried out

[-] TimLovesTech@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably because in a free from authoritarian government the free press is supposed to be the ultimate checks and balances on personal liberty. When you can't even write something negative about a leader without being dismembered in a hotel and disposed of in duffle bags like trash, that should be ringing alarms for anyone that isn't licking boots.

[-] hessianerd@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Wasn't he investigating payments from MBS to Jared Kushner?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

free press is supposed to be the ultimate checks and balances on personal liberty.

So what does it mean when "free" press is all just owned by rich chucklefucks who have a vested interest in making things as unfree for the working class as possible?

[-] TimLovesTech@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It means that the alarm bells went off and people paid more attention to capitalism, and voting in people that actively worked against them, because those elected officials treated people they disliked even worse. Then we got a wanna be dictator that went full "journalists are an enemy of the state" because they say mean (TRUE) things about him. Journalists now choose between being able to eat, or sounding the alarm that costs them a job (and falls on deaf ears).

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago

Journalists are extremely protective of their own, they really like to believe they are a separate class above the regular people. They go as far as releasing press freedom indexes that include feelings, and penalize not granting them additional rights.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
393 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32113 readers
1042 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS