For the uninitiated, generally NSFW is for sexual contents and NSFL is for gory contents. People may want to see one but not see the other at any time for any reason. I have seen this feature requested over the years in Reddit but it never happens. Maybe now some instance can finally implement it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] elvith@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct, if you work for e.g. Pornhub, NSFW might have a different meaning

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can just imagine the HR conversations at Pornhub. "Steve, we have reason to believe that you've been viewing non-pornographic material at work."

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of when new episodes of Rick and Morty were being posted on PornHub and they took them down.

[–] ricecooker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

"Steve, your numbers are down. We have reason to believe you have not been viewing enough pornographic material at work."

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can imagine they don't want accountants or IT people looking at porn while they work though. Their own websites are probably not filtered, but whether the work is for a porn site or a car manufacturer, you prefer them focussing on their work. For a content reviewer though, it's a different story.

That being said, there is not enough money in the world that would convince me to become a content reviewer. The shit they have to sit through is often utterly vile and traumatizing. Here is an article about a facebook moderator as an example: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57088382

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I was mostly joking, but yeah, being a content reviewer has got to be a soul crushing job. I can't even imagine the shit you would see.

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same if you work for the SEC.