this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1398 readers
118 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
48
That didn't take long: cryptobro realizes that blockchains is what LLMs crave. (www.chaos-engineering.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by gerikson@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

After several months of reflection, I’ve come to only one conclusion: a cryptographically secure, decentralized ledger is the only solution to making AI safer.

Quelle surprise

There also needs to be an incentive to contribute training data. People should be rewarded when they choose to contribute their data (DeSo is doing this) and even more so for labeling their data.

Get pennies for enabling the systems that will put you out of work. Sounds like a great deal!

All of this may sound a little ridiculous but it’s not. In fact, the work has already begun by the former CTO of OpenSea.

I dunno, that does make it sound ridiculous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"who needs to listen to the poet/writers/painters/sculptors/.... anyway? they're just there to make things that look good in my palazzo garden!"

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, there is a lot of bunk AI safety discussions. But there are legitimate concerns as well.

Hey, don't worry, someone's standing up for--

AI is close to human level.

Uh, never mind