this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
1053 points (98.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
4182 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a new law on Wednesday that aims to stop other states from prosecuting doctors and pharmacists who mail abortion pills to patients in places where the procedure is banned.

California already has a law protecting doctors who provide abortions from out-of-state judgements. But that law was designed to protect doctors who treat patients from other states who travel to California.

The new law goes further by forbidding authorities from cooperating with out-of-state investigations into doctors who mail abortion pills to patients in other states. It also bans bounty hunters or bail agents from apprehending doctors, pharmacists and patients in California and transporting them to another state to stand trial for providing an abortion.

Other states, including New York and Massachusetts, have similar laws. But California’s law also bars state-based social media companies — like Facebook — from complying with out-of-state subpoenas, warrants or other requests for records to discover the identity of patients seeking abortion pills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except this time, the postal service is involved and it's illegal to interfere with the mail. It's a federal offense. State laws do not affect that. So any woman in, say, Texas who gets these pills will be doing so without risk to herself. And now there's no risk to the doctor either if she gets it from one in California.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can’t interfere with them getting it, but can prohibit usage right?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Friend" or family member tipping off police and/or subpoenas for electronic messages are two ways that spring to mind, but those can be prevented if people are vigilant

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People need to learn not to allow conservatives in their lives, including family members.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and if you have a fundamentalist Christian friend who seems like a nice person (if you volunteer in animal shelters or food banks or the like you run into a lot of these), know that they will get you arrested without a moment's doubt and just pray extra hard for you while you're sitting in a jail cell

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, this, so much this.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True. If people aren't careful, they could get caught. But you could say that about weed in Texas too.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Exactly, it's a complete disgrace that people will have to be mindful of this crap just to get the reproductive healthcare they need, but if the government can't stop a people from transporting big old stinky plants on a regular basis good luck stopping people from delivering a few pills on the occasions when they're needed

[–] pau_hana@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The Polish government developed a way using tandem mass spectrometry article

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess theoretically they could do that, but I doubt deep-cut Republican Texas could afford it.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Amazingly, there’s always no funds for relief, plenty for oppression.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least until there are substantial law changes, I'm pretty sure that would require a warrant

[–] pau_hana@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, and I am not a lawyer, but I think a judge would be able to issue a warrant if there was reasonable suspicion of a "crime" being committed in that local jurisdiction. Or would something I am overlooking prevent such a warrant? It seems like the woman could be legally vulnerable in such a case.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not a lawyer either, but I think you're absolutely right about potential legal vulnerability, but that probable cause isn't going to be an easy thing for the prosecution to get. Like, miscarriages just happen all the time, and (theoretically) the strength of probable cause a judge would want to ok a "we're taking some of your bodily fluids" warrant is going to be about as high as it gets.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

There's still the wrinkle of sending prescription drugs through the mail is heavily regulated, the average doctor or pharmacist isn't allowed to just put the pill in an envelope without committing mail fraud.