this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
511 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fetterman is nothing if not amusing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 119 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I sometimes wonder if I live in an alternate reality where a significant subsection of the population has gone absolutely insane. The insanity all seemed to take off around 2016.

[–] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I blame social media. Mainlining outrage and confirmation bias through your smart phone is one hell of a way to get high

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Social media is a turbocharger to the misinformation engine that is corporate media (especially Fox 'News' and shit like Limbaugh, Beck, Infowars, Rogan, et al) post-Fairness Doctrine.

The idea that the FCC shouldn't A) reinstate the doctrine, and B) have its regulatory boundaries extend to ubiquitous cable and streaming services is fucking nutballs. Thanks, Reagan!

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some day we’ll look back at rage bait (and social media, in general) the way history looks back at opium. The tech and connectedness have remarkably advanced humanity - but unchecked, the algos and constant need for engagement have been ruinous and criminally detrimental to society.

[–] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I’m concerned, tech companies are no better than Phillip Morris peddling tobacco to children. Checking your “likes” is the new age version of smoking.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm gonna have to disagree. No one has died because they didn't get likes.

[–] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not counting the suicides, cyber bullying and countless psychological disorders amplified by social media…sure, nobody has died because they didn’t get “likes” lol

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not the same thing

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's a town hall video with John McCain around 2008 where an elderly woman tries to suggest to him she's worried about Obama because he's not white. John McCain shot her down and defended Obama and stressed we should only focus on the political differences of opinion, and his own supporters booed him. This all had been coming for so long.

Edit: I was corrected, she did not exactly state what her problem was with Obama, but it's clear that it was bigotry.

[–] JamesBean@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're thinking of the same clip, you're slightly misremembering it. The woman was insisting Obama was a Muslim, and that's what McCain was shutting down. But yes, the crowd booed him for clarifying that.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You are correct. I was poorly trying to say it was bigotry.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

February 4th, 2004, was when the slow boil started.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was from at least Reagan. But it was when we elected a black man that got things sped up pretty quick, and then when we elected a fuckind Cheeto that's when things really got super charged and turbocharged and all the other charging until what we have today

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

You could go back to Nixon and the Southern Strategy.

Feb 4, 2004, was the beginning of Facebook and the beginning of foreign powers using the platform to undermine democracy.

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It actually started really ramping up in 2008-2009. Tea Party, birthers, so on. It's amazing what happens when someone who wasn't white was elected president.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It actually started with Newt and his bullshit back in '96....well, actually it started with fucking Reagan and his trickle down bullshit back in '80...then again, maybe it started when

[–] agentsquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

This is the correct answer. It's just that the crazies, racists, and terrorists in the Republican party stopped being scared to come out in public around 2008 and even more in 2016.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Nah, Reagan proved how far racism could destroy things long before that.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

We can go back further, but that's where I put my finger on the map.

Fox News was a conservative news outlet until then. Overnight they went batshit crazy.

Between them and social media, we spiraled down into where we're at now.

[–] babyphatman@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I think it was even earlier... 9/11 really broke the safety of America (and even the "western" world) and pushed so many people down the conspiracy rabbit hole. Social media amplified this fear and brought them together giving them power.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago

My head canon is that the fixed point event in earth history is that humanity should have ended in nuclear war with the cuba crisis and the timeline has been unravelling ever since.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes I think the end of the world actually did happen in 2012, it's just that the fallout is happening over a longer time scale than anyone anticipated.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Rapture bombing wasn’t a prank, 99.99999999999999% of us just didn’t make it :-)

[–] shadowSprite@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's what I keep saying. That the world ended, but to save humanity some brave but misguided hero somehow ported us all into this slightly different but really fucked up reality. This is my explanation for the Mandela effect, that we remember our old timeline but when we look things up the research shows what happened in the new timeline so it's all wonky lol

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most soul crushing part is when you realize it’s not an alternate reality; this is where you’ve been all along and you feel betrayed by everyone you’ve ever known for hiding it from you, even about their own stupidity.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Confirmed. The worst possible timeline.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

As someone who came of age during Reagan's presidency, y'all just ain't been around long enough.

[–] Raise_a_glass@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a weird coincidence a show came out in 2016 before the election called BrainDead and the plot was that alien bugs are eating parts of our brains and causing hyper partisanship.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrainDead

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Good show just the right amount of Tony Shalhoub ;-)

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That show was great, was pretty disappointed to see it got cancelled.

[–] finthechat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Sphazz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Never went away.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Started to gain major traction around the Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck days. The Tea Party was the beginning of the end

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it started the moment Obama was elected, or at least the moment the ACA was able to pass. It just took a time for the 'batshit crazy' to scale up to mass adoption among conservatives.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

For me, it started right after 9/11. Republicans were quick to use the general fear and anger from the attacks to justify wars, spying on citizens, eroding personal freedom, etc. They've been using this same playbook ever since, just with a different boogyman, e.g. Antifa, BLM, trans people.

[–] Mudface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That evergreen college insanity clued me in

I had to understand wtf was wrong with those people, now it’s like everyone is an evergreen state college student.

This world fucking sucks

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It really probably was all the lead.