28
submitted 1 year ago by uymai@lemmy.ca to c/toronto@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

...and what if he is innocent? Seriously consider that possibility. The police doesn't know at this point, and neither do we. The mere association of his name with that crime can ruin his life even if he was completely innocent. And btw I agree the age of the accused should not matter.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Then I would say to have enough of an investigation to warrant publishing his name. Enough reason to believe that the victim is telling the truth and that more would come forward.

My concern is that once a lengthy trial process starts, it's harder to find justice for other victims. It's far better to have one trial for all cases, than separate trials just strung along (if that would even happen).

[-] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You make very valid points and I think we agree that there needs to be a balance or compromise that is never going to maximize the ability of the victims to obtain justice and at the same time also maximize the protection of innocent defendants. There will always have this tension between these two goals.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Toronto

1611 readers
6 users here now

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Friends:
Support lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS