197
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago

Queen Elizabeth was a good place to stop.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

What seems likely to me is slowly changing things bit by bit. I don't think the UK would mind either, it's just a matter of spending time and effort (and money) making those legal changes.

The final constitutional change seems unlikely anytime soon. It's very unlikely that all the provinces will agree to play ball and get it done unless there was an urgent need to get rid of it.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

unless there was an urgent need to get rid of it

Darn it the wrong royal went to Epstein's Island.

[-] gruvn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Whether or not the UK would mind is irrelevant. Much like the monarchy. LOL

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

My point is that people aren't opposed to ditching it, it's the logistical issues

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

1602? Like, around the time of the founding of Québec?

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
197 points (96.7% liked)

Canada

7144 readers
387 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS