this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
188 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39023 readers
3128 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cthonctic@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This kind of headline makes me sick: "Work of art worth X currency" - because of course it's only the financial speculative aspect that makes art valuable and no one cares about anything else. Disgusting.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, original Van Gogh gigs will sell for boatloads of money though. It's not particularly speculative.

Lesser known artists, sure.

[–] MetaRobert@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I hope he got it laminated before he started handling it.

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cthonctic@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Realistically? I think it very much is. If you can't make money with art either by producing or buying/selling/owning it then pretty much no one cares.

When is the last time you genuinely saw someone care about a work of art breaking new ground, or for it delving into truly novel understanding, or due to it invoking feelings in the recipient?

Like the outrage ober the self-shredding Banksy? Oh noes, so much value destroyed how could he!!1

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Graffiti?

The Grenfell tower fire tributes weren't produced for money, and invoke feelings

https://ldngraffiti.co.uk/graffiti

[–] cthonctic@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, that counts. And honestly, it counts for a lot more to me than speculative art trading and hoarding.