The thing I dislike most about Atlassian products is that each of them has a completely different formatting engine and markup syntax. You'd think they'd be consistent but noooo

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Atlassian doesn't even have consistency within single products! I'm using Jira Cloud at work, and while most fields support markdown (e.g. three backticks to start a code block) there are a few that only support Jira's own notation (e.g. {code} to start a code block). It's always infuriating when I type some markdown in one of the fields that doesn't support it for some inexplicable reason.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Confluence... the same emojis look different on page title on the sidebar vs the body. Two different font families.

It's incredible.

[–] sznio@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Try to do any formatting more complex than none at all in Confluence. It just gets polluted with invisible markup and changes styling randomly.

[–] SittingWave@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

The thing I dislike about Atlassian is everything from Atlassian

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully these days I spend most of my time in Confluence, which supports Markdown

[–] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both Bitbucket and Confluence partially support Markdown, but they implement it in different ways, which is maddening.