88
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by kescusay@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

You can watch live at the link. Other live links below:


Live YouTube streams

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The only conspiracy is trying to elect Donald Trump. Nearly half the country voted to elect Donal Trump. Are they all part of the conspiracy?" -Summary of statement made by one of the defendant's lawywers

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

God, that is such a pathetic defense.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Did we really expect better from the guy who doesn't pay his lawyers?

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nearly half of voters*

Half the country doesn't vote.

And to answer your question, no, most of them are not part of a criminal conspiracy. Most of them are oblivious bumblefucks who constantly ingest Fox propaganda telling them BLM == bad.

Edit: oh I didn't realize you were quoting someone else at first.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

No, I didn't make the above argument. One of the lawyers did.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 8 points 1 year ago

Right right, I caught that after

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, This was a really weak argument to be made. The charges aren't about a conspiracy to elect Trump. They're about trying to convince the secretary of state to break his oath of office, intimidating poll workers, breaking into election offices and equipment, and more. It's such an asinine argument I'm kind of floored that the judge allowed it to stand. I guess the standards are lower at this sort of pretrial hearing?

[-] holiday@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"Are you saying our victims are co-conspirators?"

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Saying something that stupid in court as an attorney should result in being immediately disbarred.

I’ve seen people making this argument online many times.

“Republicans are actively shielding Trump and interfering with investigations. This could be considered a legally defined conspiracy.”

“Half the country are republicans. Are you saying that half the country are criminals?”

It’s conflating an obvious commonality among participants, and the fact that politicians and party leaders are overwhelmingly participating, with the average voter.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Frankly, I am tired of pretending that anyone who still supports Trump at this point is too stupid and/or evil to ever be allowed to be part of representative government again.

[-] mb_@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

So, there's a conspiracy doing who knows what to achieve their goals? Nice admission..

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
88 points (93.1% liked)

politics

18933 readers
2864 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS