Steam Deck

15061 readers

131 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Follow the rules of Sopuli
Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
No piracy, there are other communities for that.
Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
Have fun.

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz

codus@leby.dev

timi@lemmy.world

RolAIDS05@lemmy.world

Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz

RolAIDS05@sopuli.xyz

125

[News] Updates to the linux kernel 6.6 suggest a hardware refresh/variant of the Steam Deck is in development (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Linux kernel has been updated for some new hardware that still includes the AMD Van Gogh APU, which is currently only used in the Steam Deck. Popular speculation is that Valve will release an updated Steam Deck, one that still uses the same APU (so same performance), but had other changes to the hardware. Possibly different screen, larger battery, etc.

Possible code name for the hardware is Galileo.

If you want more/better info, I'd recommend reading the linked article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seamless docking would be ideal, but I'd hate to have to use a proprietary POGO connection. Just fixing the proprietary dock so I don't have to power cycle it so often would also be nice :/

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

I think adding a second USB C port on the bottom would solve that, as well as other gripes. You would still have a "more seamless docking experience" because you can just set the device in the dock on the upward-facing USB C interface (like a Switch), as opposed to the current method of setting it in the dock and then plugging in a cable with a separate action. Then you would also have a second USB port (no longer requiring the use of a hub in some situations) and using a USB port on the bottom is oftentimes better than on the top.