this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2076 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2303 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EMPig@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd rather fill land with trees than with radioactive wastes.

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need a lot, lot more trees. Like several orders of magnitude. And growing trees takes longer than even building a nuclear power plant.

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be specific, growing the types of trees we would want for such a thing in such an amount that it would deal with the problems we have, assuming we stop growth of CO2 and assuming we stop burning the Amazon, would take around a hundred years.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/how-to-erase-100-years-carbon-emissions-plant-trees

"It could take more than a hundred years to add enough mature forest to get sufficient levels of carbon reduction. Meanwhile 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) from burning fossil fuels are being added to the atmosphere every year, said Glen Peters, research director at Norway’s Center for International Climate Research."

And need an area the size of the United States. I wasn't joking about a second Amazon.

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd rather this as well, but we don't have that many choices. The slower we act and the more we let perfect be the enemy of good, the more people die.