this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
131 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh yeah for sure. I'm not really up on my star wars lore. As far as I understand it the joke sort of started because Anakin and his mother is a slave in I, but there's no "slaves" in the original trilogy, which then makes people wonder how that is, which leads to a humorous observation.

The text is pretty clear that the empire is worse than the republic, but that's the joke I guess
"Sure the text says the empire is worse, but the republic had slaves haha funny observation".
Then people sort of started running with it and you end up with unironic empire stans.

Like it's just a silly joke noticing one discrepancy (slaves Vs no slaves) without focusing on the bigger picture (brutal political repression, genocide of minorities, apartheid regime, religious repression, etc.).
I don't think it was meant as something that could stand up to scrutiny, which is also why it's so strange it led to actual empire stans.
It's also what makes it more ironic to me because the empire stans go "well the empire was better than the republic" (never mind wether it was or not) and completely ignore the rebellion posing a viable alternative

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

the joke sort of started because Anakin and his mother is a slave in I

very-intelligent Well, ackshually, Tatooine wasn't part of the Republic, so that doesn't count as slavery in the Republic.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but there's no "slaves" in the original trilogy

So the woman chained up in Jabba's palace until she was fed to the rancor wasn't a slave? what

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, I'm not saying it's good or correct or anything. It's a simple joke, as I've said. It doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

It's a glaring on-screen omission that the reactionary meme missed from the start so I'm baffled.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

They're not going to do a detailed material analysis on the conditions of the Empire, because nobody would care about that, and that would bore everyone except super nerds.