this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
345 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59428 readers
3120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Let us see the data and analysis products you're gathering on our citizens to send home to the CCP"

"How dare you ask us for such an invasion of their privacy!"

[–] nix@merv.news 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They forcefully got tons of data from google, microsoft etc on US citizens. Why would they be doing it for “good” now? Just because “CCP bad”?

Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

This article and the one it links to from Forbes describe arrangements to access the data that is being collected through the app but I believe the Gizmodo headline is misrepresenting that as a request for additional invasive features. My comment is meant to point out how I perceive the drafted agreement and the pearl-clutching response from that headline.

I don't think they want that information purely in the service of Truth, Justice and the American Way™ but concerns about what the CCP has access to through their app are legitimate. Privacy invasion is unacceptable no matter who is doing it. There are cases where it is necessary but even then, it should be limited and subject to intense scrutiny to protect the rights of individuals. The Patriot act and things like it are an absolute disaster on that front, for example, but that's no excuse for feeding our information directly to a hostile foreign power.

I'd love to see hardware and software producers (as well as legislators) putting user privacy higher on their list of priorities. It's a huge problem that we're still coming to grips with and the people making the rules are generally woefully ignorant of the technology in use.

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Instead Apple and hardware manufacturers in general should prevent their products from allowing any software company from invading the people’s privacy in such intense ways.

lol, every intel processor has a backdoor called the intel management engine, it's literally a second processor running minix.