this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
533 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ex-Linus Tech Tips employee alleges mistreatment and poor conditions: “no one gets a break” - Dexerto::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 189 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't see how this surprises anyone. As soon as the handbook was leaked I just knew it was a shit place. Why? Cause I work at a shit place and they do the same shit. Shitty people rip shitty policies and implement them shittily. Linus doesn't care, he wants profit.

[–] traveler@lemdro.id 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I honestly don’t think he does it on purpose, I honestly think he’s just way over his head for years now, which is why he hired a new CEO and scaled back his position. I mean, who remember a few years ago when he talked about retiring YouTube?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So why can't employees talk about pay? Thats just an accidental whoopsie? According to the handbook they have to demonetize their channels if they have youtube channels. Guess thats just another accident? No, its malicious squashing of could-be competition while simulteanously putting their positions on a pedestal. Its classic capitalist tactics.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's terrified that his employees are going to do to him, what he did at his last place...

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, he basically built his empire off the back of his employer. LTT basically uses NCIX inventory for their early videos.

[–] dman87@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not totally accurate. It was initially a symbiotic relationship. Linus was providing marketing for NCIX as well in the early days. That does not detract from the reality that LTT would be nothing without the early support of NCIX.

[–] traveler@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Wasn’t it a win-win situation?

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can't even say that.. law trumps contract. I had to look that up for vancouver, but..

"employers in B.C. cannot dismiss, suspend, demote, discipline or harass an employee who:

  • Asks their employer about their pay
  • Reveals their pay to another employee or someone applying to work with their employer
  • Asks the employer about its pay transparency report
  • Gives information to the Director of Pay Transparency about their employer"

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/gender-equity/pay-transparency-laws-in-bc

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Abusers often don't know they are being an abuser.

[–] utopianrevolt@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that occur more happen than abusers who don't care if they are? I don't know anyone from LTT personally, but I don't necessarily get the feeling that Linus doesn't care. To your point, ignorance doesn't excuse abuse, but I think it's an important distinction to make regardless.

[–] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is a valid point because I think it affects openness to change. Linus may be a dumbass in some regards, but I'd be willing to bet he's open to change.

[–] ineedaunion@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

That's bootlicker talk.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So much truth. Look at the guy. How is front facing persona is. You know it’s some egomaniac that’s just like fuck you I need more.

It’s funny because publicly, he’s been disapproving of her in photos, chat. Like the look he’s giving her here, urgh.

It honestly sounds like my last job. Unprofessionalism in all its finest with nothing but favouritism, big egos and zero agency or responsibility given. All with endless work in tow. Yup. Good times 🙂🔫

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm there right now, lemmer, and let me tell 'ya; Fucken shoot me. I am a hamster on a wheel.

[–] million@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Duxon@feddit.de 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No vacation days in the first 12 months. Then 2 weeks of vacation per year, three weeks after 5 years of consecutive employment.

Damn, I'm happy to live and work in Europe right now, assuming that these are comparable numbers across the North American job landscape.

"Linus Media Group believes that vacation is a necessary opportunity for people to relax, refresh and recharge." LMAO

The rules on sick leave look quite awful as well.

[–] I_hate_you_welcome@feddit.nl 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jesus, I get 5 weeks instantly every year and I can buy more with salary

[–] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah insane. Land of the freee

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the US, or somewhere sensible?

[–] I_hate_you_welcome@feddit.nl 16 points 1 year ago

Somewhere sensible, with unions and such

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Oh, it's worse here in the US. Much worse.

[–] KonekoSalem@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some people have pointed out, that this seems to be a normal vacation policy within Canada. Still a shitty policy, but I wouldn't put the majority blame on LMG for this specific issue.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They’re entirely to blame for it at LMG.

I highly doubt Canada has a law against doing more than the bare legal minimum.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not blame Canada for their shitty laws? If you had a business, you might just be doing the same

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Linus controls LMG, he can’t change the laws of Canada but he can offer more than he is.

And no I wouldn’t. If I owned a business, I wouldn’t because I’d have made it a worker run co-op. Not everyone is a greedy capitalist parasite.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

There's a reason the absolutely majority of businesses isn't run like that, and it's not because all people suck.

Two reasons, actually.

  1. These people (who do not suck) often don't really have what it takes to run a successful business. It's a hard endeavor, especially in the beginning, and often if you don't do the bare minimum, you die.

  2. As you grow, having 10 clashing opinions is a paralyzing disaster for a company. Solution is to have a CEO/owner whatever, one voice to rule, but at that point, is it really that co-op you dream about?

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

This is the minimum is Canada, but 3-4 week is more common in many industries. So if they could give less, they probably would.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You're literally required to report bullying to management, but apparently the response is someone telling you to stop being such a bitch.

[–] darharrison@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of this is very boilerplate handbook wording but I gotta say some of these benefits are very average at best, especially the time off situation. This is from the perspective of a US government worker, where I regularly see my friends get hired in the private sector and receive much better time off.

And at least in southern New England, there's some straight up illegal rules in here, notably discussion of wages. Around here you cannot be ordered by anyone not to disclose what you make.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The time off situation is literally just the bare minimum legal amount in Canada.

[–] darharrison@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think the policy is pretty weak for such a well-loved (up until this week) company. Guess that's the way the industry works: put up with mediocre pay and benefits because you're "doing what you love," or if I'm feeling really jaded I'd say something like "abusing the workers' passions for the industry."