this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
1775 points (99.0% liked)

World News

40408 readers
4048 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia has enacted strict anti-hate crime laws, mandating jail sentences for public Nazi salutes and other hate-related offenses.

Punishments range from 12 months for lesser crimes to six years for terrorism-related hate offenses.

The legislation follows a rise in antisemitic attacks, including synagogue vandalism and a foiled bombing plot targeting Jewish Australians.

The law builds on state-level bans, with prior convictions for individuals performing Nazi salutes in public spaces, including at sporting events and courthouses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would love to hear your suggestions for stopping people from being openly Nazis because nothing else seems to have worked so far.

Will you get rid of them entirely? No. Can you force them to shut the fuck up with their hateful Nazi sit if they want to be a part of society? I think this will sure help.

But my family tree's lack of forks does give me a bit of an unfair anti-Nazi bias, I admit.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't about people being just openly Nazi but for any "hate-related offense". If you want to tackle any such thing you might need to look into the root causes of the issues and try to fix those, including tackling concerns from the people who become hateful, such as living conditions, education, that sort of stuff. So much like with criminality. That's a lot more work than just the "tough on crime" approach of throwing everyone into jail for a year, minimum, and hoping that will work (or rather trying to show to your voters that you're doing something).

Can you force them to shut the fuck up with their hateful Nazi sit if they want to be a part of society? I think this will sure help.

It will be the same as anywhere that already has this sort of laws, people will be less obvious about it while the same hate and message is out there. I don't think this will affect anything that giving tougher fines wouldn't and it would cause more negatives than that does. You could even have stricter punishments for repeat offenders and do fines as day fines. But prison for a year for any such offense? The scale seems off, especially when you consider that the maximum for terrorism related stuff is six years.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Less obvious" means fewer recruits. I'm not sure why you think being less obvious is just as effective as being overt.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Recruits"? The concern isn't people joining something, it's them agreeing with the message. Less obvious approach already works just fine (probably even better than direct approach) all over the world in selling the message and the hate, so if you think this mandatory year of jail will have much of an effect on that, I have a few other "tough on crime" approaches to sell to you. Might even declare War on Hate in style of War on Drugs.

As usual, people want tough and immediate measures, forgetting about a longer term approach and working to tackle the causes of why this messaging sells so well.

I’m not sure why you think being less obvious is just as effective as being overt.

Oh I don't think it's just as effective. It's not as effective, it's even more so since it's easier to get people to agree if you start small and then drop hints slowly. Obvious approach will just drive people away. You don't start with "sieg heil kill all the untermensch ", you start with something small, saying how foreigners are stealing your jobs or making the housing market suck. Then you can guide them in the direction you want without ever saying it. And shit like that is almost impossible to go after in any sensible way, without a risk of punishing people on very questionable grounds.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry... you think that averting people from joining Nazi groups is unimportant? You think they're more dangerous as individuals?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but where in my reply did you get those ideas?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The concern isn’t people joining something, it’s them agreeing with the message.

The concern is literally them joining something. One bigot alone has very little power.