this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
404 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27946 readers
5837 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 89 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

That's reusing, not recycling.

Remember, recycling is the last of the 3 Rs. You should reduce or reuse first.

[–] Brekky@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Is that true? I thought recycling was giving new purpose to an old object. Reuse to me implies another person using the object but in the same way it was originally intended.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

No, that's reusing. Recycling is breaking down the product into materials so it can be used to make new stuff.

The cycle in recycle means the production cycle.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

sad Krebs cycle face

[–] lengau@midwest.social 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Given that this is changing the product itself, it's more repurposing than reusing, which I'd say fits between reuse and recycle.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It works better if you think about the raw materials rather than the whole product;

Reduce the amount of plastic you use
Reuse the plastic you already have
Recycle the plastic you can't use anymore

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I guess it would technically be upcycling

What you’re describing is just giving/loaning/borrowing which don’t start with R but still contribute to a moneyless value economy which is still great for improving the efficient sharing of the resource pool toward desirable ends

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Reparing is the first one, idk where reduce comes into the saying.

Maybe we need to include a 4th R?

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue that repair is part of re-use, since you are allowing it to be used again. So would be part of the second r. The first r is reduce, which would boil down to: if you already have one, don't buy another. It's more effective to not need the resources in the first place.

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No it’s not, the full ladder is basically (and even legally here in NL rvo.nl )

  1. Refuse and rethink
  2. Reduce
  3. Re-use
  4. Refair/refurbish
  5. Recycle
  6. Recover

But the saying is often used as “Repair, Reuse, Recycle” in the right to repair programs.

[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The third one is ECYCE