this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
834 points (96.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
6269 readers
3683 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I love GNOME for this. No desktop icons. Windows/super key, type the first letter or two, boom. It's so pretty.
My phone on the other hand? The first screen is nicely arranged. The second screen is just a chronological list of the apps I've downloaded, because they automatically go to desktop, and they'll clutter up my home screen if I don't have a separate sacrificial screen for them
This is actually the one thing I hate about GNOME. I keep a nearly fully empty desktop but I like having one as sort of a staging ground for temp files. I like just being able to chuck a file there and then drag it into another program, all without having nautilus open
Yeah, desktop as the temp location is great for a few reasons.
I can easily see what is in the queue.
It reminds me to do something about it.
I can rearrange the dozen or so icons for fun when I am having trouble picking what to do. Kind of like inventory management in an rpg.
When I hit about 15 it prompts me to clear the list by either finishing them or putting them all away so I can start again with a clear screen.
Iirc, there's an extension to allow for desktop icons? I may be misremembering, it might be a setting somewhere. Either way, I'm sure you can do it.
Oh yeah there is, it comes with Ubuntu. It's a bit janky compared to the former native implementation though :(.
Same. I hate desktop clutter. The horrors I've seen when I've been on someone else's PC. Random desktop documents that haven't been touched in 5 years. Why?!
Even aside from looking ugly, it's not even a good place for apps/files! If you have a window or two open, everything is obscured and you have to move windows out of the way to access your stuff.
They get a lot of shit for it, but IMO Gnome was 100% right to say "No. The desktop inevitably becomes a dumping ground and we don't want that. Your app menu is for apps and your Home folder is for files. We have very good search functionality to find what you want. No desktop icons. If you want that, install an extension."
The reason I don't use Gnome is "We don't want that" Okay, and just who the fuck is 'we?'
"We" is obviously the hard-working developers who predominantly work on Gnome unpaid. The people who provide the software for free.
To be completely honest, I'm not sure how you don't know who "we" is in that context. When the devs of a project say "we", who do you think they're referring to, the Jackson 5?
Literally every project makes decisions on what their vision is and enacts it. Gnome is no different.
If you don't like a piece of software, don't use it. Nobody is forcing you to use it.
Frankly, you sound entitled. They aren't obliged to make their project to the way you want it. Especially not when you're getting it for free. Entitlement like that is the biggest cancer in the FOSS community, IMO.
Hmm, GNOME pays developers. There's a team of full time employees steering GNOME, and staff. Sure they are a non-profit, but it's a bit romanticizing to claim that they are doing all that work for free. I don't think it is very nice or productive to call people names and gatekeeping FOSS this way. There's such a thing as customization. It's fine that GNOME is very opinionated (everyone accepts that they are and the project lead has said so time and time again that user choice is not part of their focus). But, at the same time, it's not their project, there's a complex governance structure that involves the community. It's contradictory to speak this way about a component of a Linux distro. Linux is philosophically underlined by freedom of choice and personal customization, and it's inappropriate to insult people for wanting some more of that.
No, no, no, no.
Some developers do some paid work. The vast majority is unpaid. I'm not sure where you heard that, but that information is incorrect.
And I never said they did all of the work for free, I said predominantly. Same goes for other projects.
Please don't try to twist my words, I feel I was very clear with them.
Yes, it is their project. They own it. It's theirs. They are the developers.
And Gnome doesn't go against any of that. You are free to not use it. They aren't forcing you. You are free to customise it. They aren't stopping you.
Please stop acting so entitled. This is software they are providing for free, the bulk of the work being unpaid. They don't have to do free work for your specific needs if they don't want to. It's their project.
I never insulted you. If my words hurt, then I'm sorry, my intention is not to hurt you.
I'm just trying to steer you away from the path you're on of thinking you're entitled to XYZ and some predominantly unpaid devs have to cater to your whims. They do not. It's their project, not yours, and they rightly call the shots.
Sure, all those things could be argued to some degree or another. Just don't call people cancer. Throwing insults devalues your argument.
I never called you cancer, or insulted you.
See:
I said feeling like the devs owe you something is entitlement, which is a cancer to the FOSS world. You aren't owed anything, and neither am I.
Nowhere did I say you were cancer, unless you happen to proudly identify as an extremely entitled person.
Like I said, sorry if my words hurt you, but you aren't entitled to have the devs carer to you specifically. The project is theirs and if you don't like it, fork it or use something else. That's what FOSS is all about.
Why do you think unpaid devs should have to do as you say?
The availability of extensions for everything is the true power of Gnome for me. They got most things right but I love being able to tweak every little detail to my exact liking
This is exactly how I use KDE, but without the GNOME look, which I am not a fan of. You don't even need to hit meta first in KDE, you can just start typing if you have krunner on.
Windows works the same way, you just hit the windows key and start typing and you hit enter, made switching to popos much easier because I use it exactly the same way I do with my windows work laptop
Also You should check out kiss launcher for phone, just start typing and whatever app you want shows up, also has a history list that tries to have apps you use frequently at specific times. Although after using kiss for a few years now whenever I have to use someone's phone it makes it really hard, seeing all those screens with icons like how can you find anything
Why not disable apps going to your homescreen instead?