this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
12 points (80.0% liked)

AskUSA

283 readers
73 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t really understand why the Supreme Court ruled that this is legal in the first place.

Because they don't answer "political questions", they check for contradictions against the constitution, and they don't (in their opinion) think there's any conflicts with the constitution.

Congress could pass a law banning Pizza, and it would be constitutional, however stupid it is.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, IMO it's a constitutional question. I'm coming at it from the EFF's side:

We are deeply disappointed that the Court failed to require the strict First Amendment scrutiny required in a case like this, which would’ve led to the inescapable conclusion that the government's desire to prevent potential future harm had to be rejected as infringing millions of Americans’ constitutionally protected free speech.