this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
307 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39586 readers
1997 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Norway leads the world in electric vehicle (EV) adoption, with EVs making up nearly 90% of new car sales in 2024 and over 30% of all cars on its roads.

This shift, driven by decades of policies like tax exemptions for EVs, higher taxes on fossil fuel cars, and perks like free parking, has put Norway on track to phase out new fossil fuel car sales by 2025.

The country's wealth, renewable hydroelectric power, and extensive charging network have enabled its EV revolution, serving as a model for other nations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

its huge oil and gas exports

It's a lot easier for your country to "go green" when being able to do that kind of depends on lots of other places still setting things on fire, innit?

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m not sure how all the current math shakes out, but I don’t think they do require that. The sovereign wealth fund is making more money on its investments than is being generated by the sale of oil. I think, but me and Jon Snow know all the same stuff about this.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

About 127,000 new cars were sold in Norway in 2023. Whether they're all electric or not is pretty irrelevant when in the same year, Norway exported about 475 million barrels of crude oil.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh don’t mistake me for saying their hands are clean or that they aren’t exporting tons of oil. I’m just saying the oil could stop flowing and that fund would keep right on making money.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you complaining about? Are you unhappy that Norway takes on many of the issues of going non-reliant of oil, developing systems to handle northern, less benign weather? You know, from where I stand, a few hundred miles south would be a so much easier place to be, where the sun is plentiful all year long and the winters short and mild...

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

As noted above - Norway gets most of it's renewable energy from it's geographic location (88% of power coming from hydro) so them being "a few hundred miles south" would mean extreme heats and droughts that are really difficult to deal with even with perfect renewables - all the sun in the world can't give you free water (yes there's desalination but hypersaline brine is such a PIA that it's not a silver bullet) - so while it's commendable that they've gone "fully green" - until they stop making bank on their massive scope 3 fossil fuel emissions - it's a bit of a misdirection to say they're helping the global environment.

Now if they truly believed that fossil fuels were needed for a sustainable transition - then surely they would give out their trillions of oil and gas revenue to countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh to help them rebuild from the environmental disasters they're experiencing to deploy more sustainable infrastructure and housing.