358
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Erm, how many renewables projects are many years late? How many of them have taxpayers picking up the tab?

Renewables are cheap and quick to build, and turn a huge profit. Granted, that profit isn't passed down to the energy consumer, but that's an issue with the way electricity is sold to consumers. Most countries have a complete disconnect between the market for generators and the market for consumers, so the price of electricity on the consumer market will only go up even if the costs in the generation market go down.

On the generation market, nuclear electricity is more expensive than renewable electricity. Nuclear electricity is also heavily subsidised, while large scale renewables typically are not these days (because they're profitable on their own).

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Renewable energy is cheap because it's plentifull when you don't need it. Bravo. Meanwhile Germany produces 3 times more co2 than France thanks to ecologists banning nuclear energy. Bravo.

Renewable is also enormously subsidised.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

And meanwhile France on average buys electricity from Germany because the German shit works (including the renewables) and the French nuclear plants are more often off than on.

Talk about reliable energy...
And there is always sun or wind somewhere.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Hahaha that is a so comically hypocritical stance I'm not even sure you're serious!

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Just read and inform yourself for once in your life :)

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

France invested in nuclear hard at the right time. Things aren't the same now. Germany fucked up and switched various things off (coal and nuclear) too eagerly, without encouraging enough development to replace it first.

Renewables typically aren't subsidised these days. They're profitable in their own right. You don't even need to subise them, expanding capacity through the planning process will encourage their development - however subsidies could encourage even more.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"typically aren't subsidised these days". I'd like to know where you live. Because I'm pretty sure energy production is heavily subsidised, monitored and managed by governments in most places in the world.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm in the UK, and I've worked building wind farms for the last 8 years. The contracts are obviously quite nuanced and varied, and any business is going to do whatever it can to get grants and such to increase their revenue, but most of the ones I'm familiar with include payments by the wind farm to the local community.

England doesn't just not subsidise them, they've actively banned new onshore wind farms for the last 6 years - the main development has been in Scotland. This ban came in with an end to subsidies, and as a result a lot of the smaller installs (eg 1-3 turbines) stopped being built, and the return on value investment to be at scale (10+ turbines ~3MW each or higher). The downside to this is that you have fewer community projects, in favour of larger, typically foreign owned power plants. There's also a lot less venture capitalists building wind/solar farms and then selling them on immediately on completion (which is probably a good thing).

My favourite little wind farm was entirely community owned in Wales, just 2 turbines. They have school kids visit up there and they modified this exercise bike with a dynamo to power things like a light bulb, fan, USB charger and inverter for AC, so all the kids can see how hard they have to peddle to make the electricity. When they opened the place they had a local rugby player kick a ball over the blades lol. This was one of the last built with subsidies, but all of the money from the electricity generated goes back into the local community.

As for energy production being monitored and managed, somewhat. The distribution and transmission operators have decent information, but not in depth down to the generators themselves. It's all typically privately owned through multiple entities and the government doesn't have a huge amount of oversight - at the end of the day they have to listen to the experts, and the experts work in the private sector for the power companies, not in government.

[-] agarorn@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yeas, stupid ecologist Merkel and her nuclear hate.

Thanks fully the green minister habeck extended the plants for 4 great more months this year.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
358 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38647 readers
2223 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS