this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
68 points (71.5% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thanks to @General_Effort@lemmy.world for the links!

Here’s a link to Caltech’s press release: https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/thinking-slowly-the-paradoxical-slowness-of-human-behavior

Here’s a link to the actual paper (paywall): https://www.cell.com/neuron/abstract/S0896-6273(24)00808-0

Here’s a link to a preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10234

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What? This is the perfectly normal meaning of bits. 2^10 = 1024.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only when you are framing it in terms of information entropy. I think many of those misunderstanding the study are thinking of bits as part of a standard byte. It’s a subtle distinction but that’s where I think the disconnect is

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, the study is probably fine, it's the article that fails to clarify before using it, that they are not talking about bits the way bits are normally understood.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think we understand a computer can read this text far faster than any of us. That is not the same as conscious thought though- it’s simply following an algorithm of yes/no decisions.

I’m not arguing with anything here, just pointing out the difference in what CPUs do and what human brains do.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a computer can read this text far faster than any of us.

I think you missed the comprehend part.

[–] credo@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No i didn’t. Feed a book into chat GPT. You will see what fast comprehension is. I think you missed the consciousness part.

Stop being an ass.

Edit: The average person knows approximately 15-20,000 words. This is between 14 and 15 bits minimum to address every word independently. But I’m no brainologist, and I don’t know that’s how processing speech actually works. This is all just for comparison to bitwise operations.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

comprehension - the action or capability of understanding something.

LLMs don’t understand anything they read.