this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
316 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1891 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson faces growing Republican dissent over his handling of government funding, potentially jeopardizing his reelection as speaker on January 3.

Allies are urging Donald Trump to reaffirm his support for Johnson to avoid a prolonged leadership fight, which could delay certification of Trump’s 2024 election victory on January 6.

Johnson’s bipartisan spending bill, criticized by Trump, narrowly averted a government shutdown but failed to include Trump’s core debt-limit demands.

Some Republicans warn that a speakerless House would disrupt critical legislative processes, including election certification.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 193 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I just cannot believe that this country is going to be run by the worst / stupidest people and all because a lot of stupid people think Biden sets the prices of groceries...

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I just can't believe that January 6th 2021 ended up meaning absolutely nothing. Zero! Unreal.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

J6 proved you can go as far as outright insurrection against the federal government and (if you're white nationalists) a wing of the government will protect you.

It means quite a bit. If Trump takes office and starts signing pardons for all these guys, it means radicalizing a huge swath of the public. Go ahead and do some crimes. Do some terrorism. Kill some cops if you have to. Trump and his friends will have your back.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Which is precisely what Hitler did.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Here's a big part of the problem right here:

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yup. Normal Americans are disenfranchised, while flyover country is given more influence. Combine that with dark money being allowed to outright bribe politicians and our democracy is pretty much a joke.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It does have precedent though. That's how Reagan won in a landslide. Very similar circumstances - inflation, small military disaster, uninspiring president. Of course Reagan wasn't as depraved and dumb as Trump so he won by a lot more.

However inflation definitely has a history of short circuiting voters' brains. Maybe it has something to do with how the media doesn't really understand it and does a terrible job explaining it to people. I'd guess at most 5% of voters know that there are multiple inflation measures - some of which were already rising during Trump's term - and that the typically-reported number is over the last 12 months, not right now (meaning the "record low inflation" at the end of Trump's term included the whole start of the pandemic when there was deflation). Republicans are great at filling an information vacuum with their narrative, so they said it was Biden's fault and people fell for that easy explanation.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Thank you, President Camacho.

[–] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I keep telling people, it's not the darkest timeline we ended up in, but the dumbest one. Reality is always much dumber than you'd expect.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago

There's still plenty of time for it to be both.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea, darkest would probably be everyone surviving H bombs, but leaving us in nuclear winter.

[–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've already warned my family, if nukes start dropping in our area, I'm running towards the blast - I'm not hanging round to rebuild.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My whole family feels the same. There's a military base about 20 minutes away. We'd probably be dead anyway because of how close we are, but we're going to drive as close as possible just to make sure.

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What a waste. In this scenario your best act is to throw your bodies at the idiots started this mess, not to kill yourself.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd rather die in the blast than slowly doom radiation poisoning and/or cancer.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Chance of turning into a ghoul and meeting Danny Trejo in a hundred years or so though.