this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
723 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2367 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did the anti nuclear people inflate the cost fourfold, too?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, impeding something is ultimately an increase in cost. That's how it works.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The only miscalculation of the cost by -four times- was due to protest of anti nuclear protestors, according to you?

Source pls?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I was reacting to what /u/DaviddoesLemmy and /u/ryedaft were saying.

You need to take the two parent posts in consideration for my argument.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that delays don't impact the cost? Or that the impact of those delays doesn't account for the 4x budget overrun?

I think it's only one factor in the budget overrun, but still worth mentioning.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that. But saying that the only cause the project went over budget was over those protests is equally ridiculous, no?

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

True, but I never said that. It was once cause.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No that was the confusing aspect. /U/rottingleaf began a counter argument that kind of skewed your point. At first I thought it was you. But it became confrontational soon.

I just wanted to put a mild argument in that if it went over budget by that far there must've been other reasons.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you are paid $1 an hour and it takes 6 hours that is $6

If you work 12 hours that is $12

12>6

The problem with nuclear is that as a bombing target it has a greater impact than a solar farm. Having said that it was once a goal for every Canadian to have a reactor in their basement