this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
242 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39376 readers
2229 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Genuine question. Why would anyone want greenland?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

With climate change opening up more routes through the arctic seas, it becomes a strategic place to set up shop and control all that traffic (read: tax.)

Incidentally we already have a base there. (I believe it’s for launching rockets into polar orbits. Don’t quote me on that.)

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't think that's true, at least for NASA. According to their site California is the preferred launch location for polar orbits .

https://public.ksc.nasa.gov/lspeducation/launch-operations/

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently I conflated a few things. In any case it’s a Space force base

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, that does make sense. Easy to conflate the air force with NASA.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • space force. Specifically they’re part of the early warning system for nukes.
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

I refuse to acknowledge Trump's "space force". Childish, I know.

[–] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

It's an incredibly lucrative land for minerals and such, they already had to give Denmark a slap on the wrist for screwing over the local Greenlandic population.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably lots of untapped natural resources under so that ice.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Which is probably gonna be melting soon. Once that ice is gone all those minerals in the Greenland archipelago are gonna be up for grabs.

[–] NotSoSuperDude@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

Good strategic placement as the arctic ice pack melts for new shipping routes and opportunities for oil exploration