this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
734 points (96.3% liked)

People Twitter

5396 readers
196 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is it yellow fever if you also have various other variants that attract you to multiple different races?

[–] WastingCommentSpace@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I dont even understand what this means

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hot girls be hot, regardless of skin tone. I assume the same is true for men.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

This is the basis of the American melting pot! It needs to be heard!

[–] WastingCommentSpace@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am still confused but i am asexual so ill just chalk it up to that and move on and be curious about something else

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well for me its allos. but yeah similar sentiment i guess.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If I find the race based phenotypes of multiple races very arousing ( ex, Asian women because of their monolids, black women because of their melanin, white women for their paleness and freckles, etc etc) does it still count as yellow fever, because it comes accompanied by other attractions based on race too, instead of only lusting after that one race.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I got it bad bro, so many strains 🥵

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Finding a specific aspect of someone's appearance attractive, and fetishization, are not the same. A normal person could find melanin attractive, and be fine. When they are eschewing any interest in the person other than them having dark skin, you are fetishizing them. The person in this comment is pointing out how this fictional guy only dates asian women, and brings her around to be shown, rather than to enjoy the experience with in a deep way.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So yellow fever (and other terms) only counts if it's fetishisation and not attraction?

Correct, it is a pejorative used in two ways, either people racist against asians claiming anyone who isn't asian dating an asian, has yellow fever, or that person in fetishizing them. Just being attracted to a person is not the same thing.

this applies to other ethnic groups, hair colors, and many other things.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can't not fit in stereotypes, it's the Law! And if one type doesn't do it for you, you're clearly a -phobe or racist. Obviously.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

you’re clearly a -phobe or racist

Sure, you want to believe it's bullshit. But then you get to Stanford and find out "The Bell Curve" is required reading in your social circle.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It remains a rigorous and statistically valid study. I wish they'd excluded the race-based portion of the study because it's so ideologically toxic, but their primary point was that society was becoming increasingly biased in favour of individuals with higher IQ or "G" quotients, and that this should concern us as it could lead to further wealth polarisation along this axis. At no point is the claim made that IQ is a measure of human worth, or a complete accounting of intelligence - just that this measurement seemed to be correlated with better life outcomes. I really wish they'd left the study at non-Hispanic whites because that's a pretty important observation and something we should consider as a society. E.g. if a perfect "meritocracy" were instantiated in terms of economic rewards, that would be far from ideal if it meant throwing everybody else to the wolves just because they're less economically productive in that model.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The concept of IQ as a crude basic tool for evaluating severe mental injury or illness was perverted into a theory of social hierarchy that is only "proved" in hindsight.

At no point is the claim made that IQ is a measure of human worth, or a complete accounting of intelligence

That's a bald faced lie. Tons of eugenic theory revolves around the alleged primacy of intelligence as measured through IQ. The Mensa Club admits based on IQ. Employers can and do make hiring decisions based on IQ and similar exams. "Bell Curve" is exhaustively referenced as the legitimizing theory for these policies.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm aware, but the study itself makes no moral claims.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The study was produced by an individual who has made numerous moral claims outside of his writing and cited as motivation for moral crusades by his friends and political allies.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Try to keep an open mind. Merry Christmas.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

An ironic request, given the subject matter you're defending.