this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
376 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12561 readers
251 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to police, Charles Smith, 27, entered the Walmart at 1955 S. Stapley Dr. on Dec. 19 intending to film pranks for social media platforms.

Instead, police said Smith grabbed a can of Hot Shot Ultra Bed Bug and Flea Killer from a shelf without paying for it and then sprayed the pesticide on various vegetables, fruit and rotisserie chickens that were available for purchase.

Smith recorded his face, the pesticide can and the act of him spraying its contents. He later posted the recording online.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 275 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's not a prank. That could have killed people if nobody noticed it.

I hope they lock his dumb ass up for a long time.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago (3 children)

From the last wave of pranks when people licked ice creams and put it back I have learned that messing with food is a federal crime in the US and is taken quite seriously.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As it should be. The regulations were significantly increased after the Tylenol murders in 1982. It's also why we have no tamper things on many ingestible items.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s because it’s an easy way to cause the death of children. People become angry, understandably.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

It could also cause the death of a CEO, which is an even more serious concern.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Depends on which children, apparently.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Uh oh, but will that department get the ax after inauguration? Might be time to do delivery only groceries. Where I live they come from special stores with no general public access.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think they'd have a harder time getting rid of the FDA than the Department of Education, which sadly is in the crosshairs.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Honestly - and I’m asking this in good faith - why do we need a federal department of education? Every state has their own department of education and sets their own standards anyway. Is it not redundant? Do they do something special? The only thing I can recall that was federal education related was no child left behind which destroyed education and just led to children passing grades that can’t read, write or do basic math. And of course the federal student loan program, which is just the government profiteering off its youth.

Note how I’m not asking why we need the FDA. There’s not even a question about how we need it. Arguably, we need more of it.

If they get rid if the Department of Education, then they could follow up with the FDA in a couple years with no problems.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 3 points 3 days ago
[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but what if healthcare executives shopped there?