this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1135 points (92.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55110 readers
533 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that doesn't make it better. It makes it worse. So there is a VIP who uploads a miner. First the mods defend the VIP and the upload but later have to admit that it's a miner. Then mods can't do anything because the admin, the only one who could ban the VIP and uploader is AWOL since who knows; a long time. So effectively the topic is correct, the site is not safe. Uploaders can do what they want and cannot get punished because the few mods left can't do anything and the admin is missing.

[–] Gamey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the VIP can't even be banned by a mod? That's a fucked up system and I can only woder why it worked at all for such a long time!

[–] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

That's at least what the mods claim in defense that the uploader is not banned. But don't forget, the same mods also said that the upload is "not dirty" until they had to admit it had a miner included.

I honestly don't get why this behaviour gets defended here. Only because Empress was quoted? And that quote hasn't anything to do with this incident.