this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
14 points (85.0% liked)

Discuss

231 readers
2 users here now

Welcome

Open discussions and thoughts. Make anything into a discussion!

Rules

  1. Follow the rules of discuss.online
  2. No porn
  3. No self-promotion

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
14
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Blaze to c/discuss
 

Hello everyone,

Following the recent discussions on !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com and !lemmyworld@lemmy.world , it seems that people realize that Lemmy.world is subject to European laws, and not the US ones.

This is another event where US citizens seem to be looking for an instance that would adhere to their "legal culture", the previous one being the US elections, where the topic was discussed everywhere, before getting channeled into !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world

I don’t know anything about Dutch or Finnish laws, but I’ve seen many recent articles about people arrested in Germany for their social media posts that were considered hateful or violent (which is frankly a culture shock to me as an American), so I can see why some of the posts on Lemmy in the past week would be concerning.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13870047

So, the question is: could Discuss.online become that instance? And host US-focused communities like "AskUSA", "USPolitics", "USFinance", this kind of things?

I am mostly asking because there's no secret that the DO admins aren't the biggest Lemmy fans, so would you guys be okay if your instance would get promoted, potentially causing an influx of users and communities, some requiring moderation?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Things like AskUSA or USAFinances could go pretty much anywhere.

Hosting them on a US based instance seems better from a legal framework perspective, as we see with the clash between European and US legal cultures on LW

4chan

Oh no, definitely not. More like a community for US Americans to discuss without being subject to German laws, as it seems to be an issue from time to time

[–] OpenStars 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If your goal though is to see how far you can push the law, then it sounds like someone would need a lawyer? I am not one, nor do I have money I want to pay to one to find out. Why does it matter where the exact line could theoretically be drawn, if it's so dangerous to even approach it? Like child porn or piracy - even if merely sharing links to such rather than the reality of such directly, sites get taken down all the time, and then those sites aren't useful for anything at all.

I get that you are trying to do some kind of morality crusade about the rightness of the cause of whatever, but nobody knows what the USA is going to look like in the next month, 3 months, 6 months, or a year. The DOJ (Department of Justice) may be removed entirely, along with several other departments in the government, and what will then take its place?! Even if that were not true though, the DOJ could ask Discuss.Online for the IP addresses of everyone who interacts with this server. With names and identities revealed, anyone who has commented on this post may be investigated. Why risk that? And totally aside from any consequences to users, what if some agency had to ask jgrim and lazyguru for such records every single time a post like this happened - or even anytime someone responded, or even voted? It could be a huge nuisance even just to comply. Or not, what do I know, but I didn't sign on to make another, better, more friendly 4chan, or to come anywhere within a mile (or kilometer, whatever) of something even remotely illegal.

And telling people that murder is okay - regardless of the rightness or wrongness of such (e.g. even if not serious but merely to lay off some steam) - seems to fall into that category?

You say it's definitely not 4chan, but it sounds an awfully lot like 4chan, or if you meant to make it better than that, the difference hasn't been made clear, nor how much effort it would take to achieve, nor do I see anyone volunteering to do that effort either. (Edit: and to be clear, I'm not volunteering for such either.)

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

the DOJ could ask Discuss.Online for the IP addresses of everyone who interacts with this server. With names and identities revealed, anyone who has commented on this post may be investigated. Why risk that?

But that's beyond the question I was asking. From https://discuss.online/legal

discuss.online is operated by Jason Grim, LLC., and is hosted on servers operated in United States of America. All content on this server is expected to be legal in all of these jurisdictions.

So whatever the current laws of the USA are, then Discuss.online will comply.

something even remotely illegal.

Neither did I. It just seems that the USA have different laws than the ones Lemmy.world is operating under.

And telling people that murder is okay - regardless of the rightness or wrongness of such (e.g. even if not serious but merely to lay off some steam) - seems to fall into that category?

That's probably the core of the question. People in the LW thread were advocating that jury nullification for future crimes is legal in the USA. If it is, and if there is no clear rule on DO to prevent those (as far as I've checked, there aren't, but happy to be wrong on this), there are two options

  • add a rule similar to the LW one
  • accept that people talk about jury nullification for future crimes

You seem to prefer the first option, but then you probably need to had this one to the rule of !AskUSA@discuss.online