this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
706 points (92.5% liked)

Lefty Memes

4550 readers
416 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It's funny how Europeans didn't feel the needed to give any of their land to the Jews, even though they're responsible for the Holocaust.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

What?!? This was a perfect opportunity to ~~get rid of Jews and Brown people at the same time~~ settle the promised land! Did you really expect the ~~racists~~ upstanding European leaders not to take it?

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe because Britain had already mandated a Zionist quasi-state (that would eventually become modern day Israel) and Zionist Jews were already migrating there even before the Holocaust? Or are we simply ignoring that part of history?

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, we're not ignoring Britain's culpability at all. I guess you don't get that Palestine wasn't Britain's land to give, or all the homes and farms Zionist seized.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So whose land was it to give then?

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I'm sure it is to you.

Edit: since Mr. Disingenuous isn't going to get back on track I'll leave my argument here. The reason I'm asking who is supposed to give the land is because if the governing body isn't giving the land it means the people living the land should do it. But how are people supposed to give the land? Yes, people can physically give their land to Zionists but people can't legitimize a Jewish Nation. It would just be, let's say a Jewish town within Austria, but it would still be Austria and not a Jewish nation. Only the governing body can create a Jewish nation.

Also it's not the European people who caused the holocaust and they were victims of the war as well. Their homes were destroyed, they needed to rebuild their lives, and then they also need to give their land to Zionists because of something they had no control over?

And while I do think Britain completely dropped the ball and is very much to blame for creating this conflict between Palestine and Israel, it's very much history at this point and it's pointless to argue over history. Pointing the finger at what Britain or Europe did or didn't do a century ago does nothing because at this point it is what it is. If we want this conflict to end we should look at what can be done now.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your colony is going to end up like the 3rd Reich.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't even know what that means.

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not going to exist in a few years. You shouldn't have pissed off Iran.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I really appreciate this thread, please do go on.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Of course you're going to assume I'm pro Isreal... I guess I shouldn't be surprised considering you don't know history and you don't understand that for your "Reich" comment to make sense it should've been fourth Reich not third Reich.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also it's not the European people who caused the holocaust

The Nazis weren't European?

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Were the majority of Europeans Nazis? Yes, a very specific subsection Europeans caused the holocaust, but that does not represent all Europeans. If you choose to generalize an specific region of the earth based on what one country did then I guess you're a rapist because I'm pretty sure there are rapists in your country and I'm choosing to generalize your entire country (including you) based on those rapists. Except I won't actually do that because that would be fucking stupid.

To get back on track, the other person used Europeans in a general sense which means I took it in the general sense. If they meant Nazis they should've said Nazis.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They had been migrating or atleast trying to since the Ottoman empire controlled the region, Ottoman authorities were able to keep them out to a degree but it was most likely a failing attempt on the long term regardless.

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, allot of countries let some lands for jews, but they don't want it. They want specifically they holly land.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Source? And is it notably different than from, for example, the land the US government "left" for native Americans? Deliberately too small and unproductive to support the population's needs?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Varied by country, the Jewish Oblast was kinda shit, but the land in Alaska had potential for example. The Alaska thing wasnt official just an idea a lot of folks were lightly okay with.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A Jewish reservation. In Alaska.

Bro...

Know any other groups of people who might need reservations in Alaska? Know any of them who actually have their rights respected?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was also ones proposed in Uganda, southern Argentina, Madagascar, and Tasmania. Though I will note that last one is a bit scarce and I only know of it due to an obscure book from the 1890s.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The Madagascar plan was the Nazis and explicitly designed to starve them all to death. I assume the Tasmanian idea is similar in goal. "Hey, this area will technically fit them all, we don't need to check how much of the land is arable ;)"

I don't think you could create a sovereign space for a couple million refugees in either Uganda Argentina but feel free to correct me.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I think the Tasmania thing was a throw shit at the wall thing. But you could definitely keep a strong population in southern Argentina, that part of Patagonia is pretty fertile.

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

Well, in from Argentina and I can say a good and wealthy part of the capital was left for jews in the time, and other parts of o country, and I know some others countries did the same, but that wasn't well accepted by the time. Still we have some tiny communities in that zones from that time.

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That brush you're using there is the wrong size

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Not really, Leopard isn't remembered like Hitler because Hitler's victims were European.