this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
533 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2295 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Putin’s actions after Trump’s election, including a delayed congratulations and a denial of a phone call, suggest a lack of respect for Trump’s personal relationship with him.

Russia’s intelligence chief’s statement that Trump owes them favors for their support in his election, along with hints that he is expected to “pay back” certain obligations, amounts to a bold threat of blackmail.

Trump’s foreign policy, which favors a realignment with Russia, may be challenged by Putin’s actions and the revelation of Russian interference in the election.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think a lot of perceived malice is secondary to his selfishness and utter disregard for anyone or anything outside his extremely small inner circle (and even then, he has no qualms shoving them out).

He's the kind of guy that would forge his own grandma's checks to have money for the casino. Not that his intent to hurt his grandma, how she feels is a thought that doesn't enter his head. He just needs money and there's money and that's the extent of his capacity to empathize. If he gets caught he'll lie or rationalize. He's not the bad guy for doing it, they're the bad people who caught him and made such a big deal out of it.

Basic sociopath. He did so many unquestionably immoral and illegal things but didn't even think to keep his fingerprints off of everything. He doesn't even think about how others would perceive him and thus doesn't even make a half-assed attempt to cover his tracks.

Not to say he's not intentionally malicious, but usually that's aimed at victims after they speak out, because in his mind, they're the bad guys. He can't comprehend how others think, or even that people could think or behave differently than him, so he just assumes a whole lot of other people do the same exact stuff and feels like he's being singled out. There's a module in his brain that never got wired

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The danger in this term is that there are far more groups who are far better prepared now to take advantage of this traits for their own gain. I think a good chunk of why his first term had so much bumbling about was because people weren't prepared. Now groups like heritage front and such have a playbook on how to handle him, the potential for actual damage in this term is much greater.

IMO, I think the best chance at damage mitigation is if the GOP congress is as dysfunctional as it has been the last 2 years, but I don't hold much faith in that.