this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
189 points (95.7% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2597 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Palestinians in the West Bank are largely pessimistic about Donald Trump’s re-election, viewing it as unlikely to significantly worsen their already dire situation, though some fear it could embolden Israeli actions.

Trump’s support for Israel’s far-right policies, including the potential dismantling of the UN agency Unrwa and backing of Israeli settlements, could deepen economic hardship and escalate violence against Palestinians.

While some Palestinians worry about increased oppression, others see a Trump presidency as a chance to expose brutal realities, possibly sparking stronger resistance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 7 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

being angry at voters who didn't vote the way you wanted them to isn't going to actually achieve anything, though

harris didn't even win the popular vote. it wasn't even a particularly close election. you can't not blame the dnc after a defeat like this.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 15 points 21 hours ago

I can and I will. If voters are ok with fascism, fuck them. And if women are ok with being considered objects to own, fuck them too. This "I didn't feel energised to go vote" bullshit is just bullshit to avoid take responsibility. You had a choice: fascism or not. You chose fascism.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you're voting on lunch and the choices are between an anchovy pizza and a shit sandwich, and your coworkers choose the shit sandwich, do you blame the people who told you to vote for the anchovy?

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

if whoever suggested the anchovy pizza knew that most people there didn't like anchovies, and therefore wouldn't have a preference, allowing shit-sandwich to win, then yeah?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

What do you think is achievable at this point? America is going to turn into a fascist dictatorship and lots of voters did not give enough of a shit to stop it.

You want to tell me being angry at voters achieves nothing? Neither does blaming the DNC. American democracy is over.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand why you believe the DNC is deserving of some measure of protection from criticism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand why you think that's what I believe. Criticize it all you want. It won't change a thing. The DNC is a non-factor from now on because there will be no more actual elections.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

I think I better explained my response in my other comment.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think the election of 2028 was going to look like after Kamala's term?

How many "possibly the last ever election"s were the Democrats planning to win in a row? There didn't seem to be any intention to back away from that precipice.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

What do you think the election of 2028 was going to look like after Kamala’s term?

I don't know. But I can tell you what it wouldn't look like: the last election in Russia.

It will now.

Enjoy.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

In a democracy, the correct approach is to hold the majority accountable for their leader's actions, especially when the leader is doing exactly what they said they would do. Non voters are also complicit by standing by silently, so I'm not opposed to holding them accountable too.