this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pros:

  • Delicious
  • Cheap
  • Kill anglos and fr*nchs
  • Funny name
  • The flower does a weird thing

Cons:

  • Fucks up the soil big time
  • Has micotoxins (tho check point 3 on pros)
  • Jimmy Carter
  • False advertisement: It's not made of pee despite its name
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do they fuck up the soil? Or do you mean soul? hexbear-specter

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Peanut farming it's very aggressive on the soil

[–] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I would have thought as legumes they produce green manure that helps the soil? Is this incorrect?

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the logic of industrial scale ag can make anything bad.

I used to work in a farm where we grew peanuts, but only like maybe 100 row feet or so, and rotated with dozens of others crops. it was a very sandy, coastal soil so we could harvest by hand with a digging fork, though like most annuals, planting involved tillage. the impact was reduced by how sandy it was and we weren't assholes, so we kept passes to a minimum.

I've seen peanuts grown at a slightly larger scale in southern Japan, think like 50' thick strips along the borders of fields stretching for miles. also southern/coastal so still sandy.

I've never really seen big monocrop peanut fields like I'm sure exist in the southeastern US, but I'm sure it's rough.

the general benefit of legumes grown for crop is less that they leave fixed nitrogen behind and more that they fix their own instead of requiring it be brought to them. that's a big deal in terms of energy expenditure and global warming potential of the production system.

[–] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Okay, I have learned way more about peanut agriculture than I expected today, but this has been a way valuable lesson. Thank you!

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

incredible.

what used to take several hundred years of ignorant human toiling can now be accomplished in just a few days with hundreds of gallons of fossil fuels.

the future is now.

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] NPa@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

why does the tractor have boss music? scared

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Have you ever fought a tractor?

[–] penitentkulak@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

In a well balanced permaculture system they are great for exactly that reason, in a typical monoculture with mechanized harvesting they require a lot of tillage.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Nitrogen fixers? Yeah, but harvesting the peanuts require tilling the ground.

[–] QueerCommie@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

As a big peanut enjoyer: scared