Apple

17499 readers

108 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

Processing photos on a MacBook Pro (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago by LOLjoeWTF@lemmy.world to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My partner has a CanonRP which takes pictures at a resolution of 6240 x 4160. They're currently using a MBP from about 2016 with 16GB of RAM. The screen is beautiful to work with - but any image processing in Lightroom can be measured in half-minutes. It takes a LONG time to see a change.

The laptop basically doesn't leave the office. I've been trying with the idea of upgrading to a newer MBP or an iMac or a Mac mini + a cinema display. I'm trying to keep it under 3K.

The cinema display and iMac don't seem to be as bright as the MBP screen which I found odd. I'm also not sure if performance impacts of using an M4 vs M4 Pro. I'm sure whatever is picked out will smoke the existing machine.

I'm looking for advice that anyone can offer. My partner doesn't want to venture outside of the apple ecosystem.

Thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LOLjoeWTF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah that's a solid approach. I like that. Any idea why the Studio displays aren't as bright as the MBP screens? I haven't compared them side by side before. I should probably do that.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 3 points 2 weeks ago

My immediate reaction is 'because they don't have to be'. Laptops are very very bright these days because the expectation you'll be using them outside and thus need to be able to overwhelm the sun.

Desktop monitors don't have to/aren't used like that, and so there's no reason to have them be as bright.

Also, the brighter the monitor the more color will start deviating from being completely accurate, and something like a studio display is aimed at creators who want it to be perfectly accurate, so that's likely another part of it.

I don't think I'd buy an Apple monitor mostly due to them being priced in a way that really makes no sense: for what your wife is doing I'd look at the ASUS ProArt monitors. They're focused on accuracy and creator workflows, come calibrated, and for the price difference you could buy three or four of them instead....