traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns
Welcome to /c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns, an anti-capitalist meme community for transgender and gender diverse people.
-
Please follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct
-
Selfies are not permitted for the personal safety of users.
-
No personal identifying information may be posted or commented.
-
Stay on topic (trans/gender stuff).
-
Bring a trans friend!
-
Any image post that gets 200 upvotes with "banner" or "rule 6" in the title becomes the new banner.
-
Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.
-
When made outside of NSFW tagged posts, comments about dysphoria/traumatic/transphobic material should be spoiler tagged.
-
Arguing in favor of transmedicalism is unacceptable. This is an inclusive and intersectional community.
-
While this is mostly a meme community, we allow most trans related posts as we grow the trans community on the fediverse.
If you need your neopronouns added to the list, please contact the site admins.
Remember to report rulebreaking posts, don't assume someone else has already done it!
Matrix Group Chat:
Suggested Matrix Client: Cinny
https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat
WEBRINGS:
🏳️⚧️ Transmasculine Pride Ring 🏳️⚧️
⬅️ Left 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈 Be Crime Do Gay Webring 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈 Right ➡️
view the rest of the comments
Best collection of resources I know:
https://dragonsroost.neocities.org/
Here are some criticisms of structural dissociation:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210507154502/https://polyfrazzlemented.dreamwidth.org/40446.html
As a Marxist-Leninist I see it as a complete failure that increasingly ignores contrary evidence. Examples:
Assuming someone w/ disordered plurality without early childhood trauma must have childhood trauma and just forgot it b/c otherwise they would have developed it "too late" according to the model
Headmates can be created by people with no history of trauma or dissociation, and tulpamancy skills can be applied to disordered plurals implying commonality between disordered and nondisordered plurality
So I'm interested in diamat approaches to consciousness and will eventually read more Vygotsky. Although I've heard some English translations are very bad.
"Why does X theory proposed by liberals not account for A, B, and C?"
Okay for real though, why does coffee make me tired?
Not exactly sure but I do know a lot of people with ADHD have the opposite expected reaction to it.
Thank you for sharing! I read a bunch about it and found it very interesting, as someone who's currently I guess seeing an IFS counsellor, which has been my "medical" introduction to it (although therapist doesn't seem to believe in complete integration, just mentions reparenting, compromising, inner dialogue, etc. all of which sound kinda healthy to me. She also believes that everyone is a system as well, which I found interesting, wonder what your thoughts are on that?).
The structural dissociation critique is interesting, yikes that ending.
(love that pic btw)
I don't really have an opinion and I don't know much about IFS parts but I thought they don't really behave as independent agents? Although headmates being parts of a system who work together is a very popular framework so I suppose from that POV it makes sense to compare the two. To each their own, but that framework isn't personally relevant.
Extended version of her calling me out
Thank you for saying this, I appreciate you clarifying.
good tweet