this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
383 points (97.5% liked)

News

23320 readers
4642 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration is moving ahead with a new path to student loan cancellation for Americans who face steep medical bills, child care costs and other types of financial hardship that prevent them from repaying their loans.

Announced Friday, the proposed rule is President Joe Biden's third attempt at student loan cancellation as he faces repeated legal challenges from Republican states. His first plan was rejected by the Supreme Court last year, and his second plan has been temporarily halted by a federal judge in Missouri.

The new rule would have to clear a number of hurdles before it becomes official, and it's unclear if it could be realized before Biden leaves office in three months. Like Biden's other loan forgiveness proposals, it could face court challenges from conservatives who say it's unconstitutional and unfair.

If finalized, the new rule would allow the Education Department to proactively cancel loans for borrowers if the agency determines they have an 80% chance of being in default on their loans within two years. Others could apply for a review to determine if they meet the criteria for cancellation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And how is that in any way comparable to Biden yet again trying to give student loan relief, something he has tried every few months since getting into office?

If an earthquake destroys San Francisco tomorrow, I suppose Biden should hold off sending in FEMA until after the election too?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a game theory problem to me, and the democrats want to shrink the playing field, not increase it, they have structural advantages and the wider the tools acceptable the more the right can take advantage of it, ala CU and modern media.

The more noise, the more everybody loses. Longer campaign seasons are killing this country.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I am not going to reply to you in multiple threads. If you want me to address this one, I will delete my other comment and do so.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, because that's established norm.

Again, I'm for the move, I just know what the response will be from the other side.

In terms of game theory this is a short term gain for a massive long term loss, this is like the court appointment nuclear option, it was used more effectively by the other side because they had fewer scruples in the way.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Again, this is like saying if an earthquake destroys San Francisco tomorrow, it's too close to an election for Biden to spend the money it would take to send FEMA in to help people.

People are suffering right now financially, in part because of crippling student loans. If you aren't, that's great. Suggesting struggling people should have to wait to get help they really need from someone who has spent four years trying to help them because now it's too close to an election is ridiculous.

I'm also put in mind of what Obama was told about making a vacant supreme court appointment too close to an election, which resulted in, amongst other things, Roe v. Wade getting struck down.