Asklemmy

44184 readers

1164 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

120

Do lesbians have a concept of Top and Bottom? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by stoicmaverick@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's been a long ol time since I've known any lesbians well enough to ask such things, but I followed my brain down a weird line of inquiry, and got to wondering about the current state of the art for the gay gals. I guess I had always assumed it was similar to the dynamics of a gay guy relationship, but then I realized that since men have both an input and an output, they can choose, but it's mechanically a bit different for cis women. Is there any relationship between that, and the slightly more masculine versus feminine flavors? Asking for a friend, who is me. I want to know. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You'll find that in queer culture, there's not just top/bottom but a wide spectrum to define or describe preferences; I'm sure this all also applies to the BDSM world as well. There's a variety of tops and bottoms and preferences like Bambi lesbians who don't want sexual dynamics beyond cuddling and kissing.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Ya, but why is everyone jumping to BDSM? That's not what I asked. I've never heard the term before, but I feel like "Bambi lesbian" is kinda reinventing the wheel for the sake of a cute name. Isn't that just a romantic asexual with a gay modifier?

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the reason people are jumping to BDSM community terms is because BDSM people fucking love terms. They've got taxonomy for days, and they live to whip it out, so to speak.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It’s also because like half the time a woman refers to herself as topping a woman that’s the context

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Bambi is an old term, older than me. It predates descriptions like homoromantic asexual, so not reinventing the wheel at all

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it kind of is, as far as i can tell, or at least it's adjacent, though the term actually predates modern asexual nomenclature, and the split-attraction model, which didn't really take off until the internet did. 'bambi lesbian' has merely had a resurgence in recent years because it sounds cute as hell.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It also seems to be additional evidence that Rule 34 predates the internet.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i don't see the relation to rule 34

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just the idea of sexualizing nonsexual things for no reason and/or it's funny.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

All right, then. Keep your secrets.