this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
372 points (97.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
229 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's embarrassing because of how extremely litigious Nintendo is, and that they are themselves profiting using other people's work (emulators and/or ROMs acquired from the internet), the exact thing they ruin lives over.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

I would have thought its embarrasing that they couldnt provide real hardware for an official museum

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Aren't the emulators licensed for this kind of use?

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just so we're clear, are you under the impression that "ROMs acquired from the Internet" represent something other than Nintendo's work?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, i would generally consider ripping roms as something requiring effort similar to cracking a game

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

...

"Ripping" ROMs, or dumping them, takes almost no effort. If you have the cartridge reader its about as much work as taking photos off an SD card. Certainly nothing at all like cracking a game, which is pretty much software development.

Please consider informing yourself before forming strong opinions.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then why doesn't Nintendo do it themselves?

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They were observed finding one ROM on the Internet, ever. They do have their own emulator(s).

Nintendo is a bunch of humans. If my boss asks me to see if I can find the installer for an old version of our software, you can bet I'll check anywhere before volunteering to go scrape old hard drives.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

This is the part where I focus for half a second and realize this is about SNES and everything makes a lot more sense. I would hope newer stuff would have some form of protection 😅

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying they haven't used others work in the past, but they do have their own emulators and ROMs. They have for a long time. They are still terrible, but this just doesn't seem like a big deal to me

Edit: Also, whose lives have they ruined aside from those profiting off of distributing copyrighted material? Taking down a fan game doesn't sound life ruining

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They are banning emulators but are then using them themselves. They are banning roms but are then using those same roms themselves.

Sounds like hypocrisy to me

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Alright. Let me make sure I understand. Since Nintendo protects its IP, it isn't allowed to use its own IP?

Like, fuck Nintendo, but that doesn't even make sense

[–] Nima@leminal.space 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yes it is. what they're doing is shitty, not illegal.

"Hey don't use emulators to play our games we're gonna sue you.

... and then just take that emulator software you made and sell it in our official devices. but still fuck you."

not illegal. just giant assholes with no sense of self-awareness.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

They are not "banning" emulators. They take action against two sorts of problems: leaking, and distribution of copyrighted material. Yuzu was taken down because they stupidly started charging for help with playing Tears of the Kingdom before its release. Other emulators have been threatened because they included binary console OS software (rather than actually fully emulating the console itself) or actually distributed game ROMs.

Dolphin has been around for about 20 years now. Why? Because they don't distribute copyrighted material, recommend against doing so, and don't require to include any binaries from the console.

Here's all they had to both say and adhere to, to "survive" the supposedly blood-hungry Nintendo for longer than some of the people reading this have been alive:


Where can I download game ISOs/ROMs?¶

Short answer: You don't. Buy games and dump them with a Wii.

Long answer: Downloading commercial games is illegal and thus strongly frowned upon by the Dolphin developers. To prevent legal issues, this includes gray areas like downloading games which you purchased earlier. You don't necessarily need to own a gaming console by yourself because you can buy a game disc and dump them with a friend's console. On the other hand, copying a friend's game dump is considered illegal again.

https://dolphin-emu.org/


Also, lol @ the idea that it's hypocrisy for them to use their own game files. You understand that's what a ROM is, right? It isn't magic. It's just a binary file.