this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13547 readers
22 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
PaX@hexbear.net
111
"Famous" AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Work (gizmodo.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But I still want to get paid for it

If only there was an economic system that made it so he could make a good living regardless of the output of his work... soviet-hmm

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At the end of the day, I think this is the important thing. Arguments about IP and how AI (or AI "artists") affect artists are understandable, but are missing the forest for the trees.

There's one, singular reason art isn't well recognised nor compensated: Capitalism. And so long as it exists, no attitude or approach to AI, no purity filter, no level of enforcement of IP law, is going to effectively protect artists and meaningfully allow them to pursue their work.