this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
2189 points (98.7% liked)

Science Fiction

13739 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The expense always looked like almost utopic to me.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Truly ? What aspects of it ?

I mean they do have universal basic income on earth but apart from that humanity is all kinds of fucked. And it doesn't exactly get better as the story progresses.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The fact that the earth is even united and not completely screwed is already a great start. It was even recovering from climate change before Inaros.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 14 points 1 year ago

The earthers are not doing that bad in the beginning that is true. But the rest of the system have it rough.

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair to Inaros he did end global warming and the overpopulation of earth.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago

Inaros did nothing wrong.

[–] teft@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The earth is united like the United States is united. The tribes just got bigger is all. Instead of NATO vs BRICS, the Expanse universe has Earthers vs Martians vs Belters. And people are suffering hard on earth as evidenced during Bobby’s trip to the ocean.

[–] busteray@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bobby's saw a very different earth in the books tho.

People living in UBI weren't really living a paradise but they weren't homeless hobos like in the show.

[–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

Example B of earth being shittastic is the entirety of The Churn novella

The story for The Churn is entirely Earth based and provides a description of what the average life in a crowded, metropolitan city is like in the world of the Expanse. The city of Baltimore has given way to a multitude of crime bosses, and organized black markets. There are multiple bosses who each keep a "family" of personal guards that operate the smuggling of goods, illegal memory implants, weapons smuggling, cybernetic implants, and other illegal goods and services. The story takes place over the course of about two days.

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone starts to come together in the last book though.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

They're kind of forced to by an outside context problem, to quote Banks.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago

In a very... Specific way.

[–] nxfsi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago
[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't the UBI on earth literally so poor that people on it are stuck in lives of poverty unless they can get into some kind of training scheme?

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago

Mostly they suffer from extreme boredom and mediocre lives. Nothing drastic but soul suckingly unfulfilling.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You mean dystopic right ... right?

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not at all. It always looked like something in between for me. Humanity is still struggling but moving forward, and most people live under various kind of regimes but no big bad Empire.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the belters have it pretty rough and Mars is basically totalitarian. And without spoiling anything I'd suggest you keep reading, it is worth it :).

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have a question for you, fancy pantsy book reader on their own instance: should I watch the show and then read the books, read the books and then watch the show, or read the books and skip the show?

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't really matter as the show ends three books short. You probably want to read them though rather than try and pick up from book 7 after the show as lots of characters were changed a bit in the show and one is killed due to off screen drama who should survive.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

That character death was so sad. But the reason behind the scenes was absolutely justified

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Watch the show and then read the books. In my opinion the show is fantastic and incredibly enjoyable (except for ending the series in what is obviously the middle of a significant plot thread, which is annoying) but the books are even better and spoiled the show a tinsy bit for me.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well my pants aren't fancy at all thank you very much :p.

The show is great, and so are the books. Mostly I would start by watching the show which is, for the first season at least, much more polished imho (the writers of the book were also show runners). After that, the show ends at book 6 (there are 9 total) but several character arcs are tweaked so I would recommend reading at least books 3 to 6 before 7.

[–] Brainded@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"(the writers of the book were also show runners)"

This must be why the books read like a TV or movie script to me.

[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The books came much earlier than the show. What they meant was that the showrunners involved the writers of the books in the production of the show, which resulted in a much more faithful adaptation than is usual for these things.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 1 points 1 year ago

Yes exactly. Thank you for clarifying my mangled sentence :).

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Listen to the books, don't care about the show.

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Winston Duarte has entered the chat.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 2 points 1 year ago

The chat has become Winston Duarte.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you would enjoy the belter life much?

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Belters are a vast minority, though.

[–] Marruk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The population numbers sort of... even out later in the books.