World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Meanwhile... Facing Economic Collapse, Afghanistan Is Gripped by Starvation
...
...
The way the US moved to leave was a disaster, now punished with these bloodsuckers demanding help for problems they themselves create.
I mean what else could the US have done? The entire afghan military and government folded within days. They’ve got to help themselves at some point.
Not pressuring the Afghani government into releasing ~5,000 Taliban fighters as part of the pullout would have been a good start if I'm being honest. Donald "Art of the Deal" Trump himself basically sentenced that country to die when he agreed to those terms.
I agree that it's a sad state of affairs that the military and government caved so quickly. 20 years of help and they couldn't manage to stand up on their own, all things said and done. Not calling you wrong, but the way we left was a disaster, and honestly we should have reneged on the deal once Biden took office and found a better way to transition out of the country.
Us being there was pretty much an unmitigated disaster from start to finish for sure, up to and including how we left.
But at the same time, holy shit, a country and its people have to advocate for themselves at some point
Agreed, it's mind-boggling that they couldn't manage after such a long time.
USA could have been in Afghanistan for 200 years and they still wouldn't be able to put together more than a humpty dumpty army. The problem isn't even Afghan ineptitude as such, the problem is that US policymakers start and stay completely ignorant to local cultures and customs wherever they decide to stick their dick.
Next time don't support the losing opposition of shitty warlords that made the Taliban look better in comparison lol.
I seriously don't get why they decided to make them the government of Afghanistan if they were going to invade anyway and could have set up a real government with a proper election.
Almost like they wanted some former criminals who would follow every order given to them in exchange for becoming the head of the country.
The biggest mistake was to not have full female-only battalions in the Afghan army.
The Taliban isn't the organization demanding help. They seem relatively content to squat on the administrative offices in the central urban areas, simply to keep American military out.
The US economic sanctions are hitting all the folks on the periphery. The liberal institutions that used to live under the American military shadow are the ones we've effectively pincered between our punitive fiscal rules and the Taliban's own ultra-orthodox conservative social policy.
This is exactly what happened to Iran in the early 80s. A revolution powered by a combination of progressive anti-monarchists and revanchist religious leaders emerged victorious, only for the progressives to get knee-capped by a Reagan government that claimed to be targeting the religious leadership. The only way to make this analogy more perfect would be for the US to start funneling chemical weapons into Turkmenistan so they can start chipping away at the Afghan western border, like they did with Saddam's Iraq back in the early 80s.
Taliban squats on suffering of afghani people and slices it's workforce in half just because. They know the donations would come. They don't need to do anything for the west to feel pity of this country for the years of occupation - and while Talibs don't have anything to do with it afghani nation would be carefully supported whatever bullshit they do.
Talibs took over Afghanistan in mere days because the existing government (whatever platform they even had) was too codependent on american presence. Corrupt and weak, without any political or military might, it predictably flopped. That's what 20 years of this 'buildimg' effort went up to become. There were no plan to leave, especially that fast, and as long as it existed the way it did, no one bothered to nurture afghani own political ground. And when they left, it crumbled.
20 years in the wilderness fighting a guerrilla campaign against a hostile invading army does little to cultivate a base of moderate bureaucrats.
The donations can't come so long as they remain head of the national government. The US sanctions regime forbids it.
The prior government was made dependent on US presence as a control on their domestic authority. This was a feature, not a bug. Americans gave the Iraqi government too much slack, and they immediately started forming diplomatic relationships with their Iranian neighbors. So we ran Afghanistan differently, hobbling the Kabul government such that they couldn't do anything without US consent.
Then we left, and the administration collapsed like a house of cards, because that's all it really was. Just the window-dressing of a liberal democracy over a foreign military dictatorship.
But when we left, we also ripped out the base of the Afghan economy. We looted the national treasury. We shut down all the interstate electronic infrastructure. We froze access to foreign markets. And we threatened any business that hoped to do trade into Afghanistan with the same kind of penalties. Consequently, we crashed the Afghan economy and effectively blockaded it from access to fertilizers, medicines, and food imports that the state was relying on up to this point.
That is ultimately what's driving the current famine. Afghan is effectively under siege by threat of the US federal government.
Jesus fucking Christ. Tell me you know nothing about the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution without telling me you know nothing about the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution.