this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
88 points (95.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
559 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
88
Is Usenet an option for /Piracy? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by freewifiiiii@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Usenet is unmoderated. Once you post it, it sticks forever. We could probably get one of the independent providers to give free access to a new newsgroup. Anyone have any thoughts?

I’ve used Usenet for my content needs for years because it’s so fast and risk free. I think we could also use it for our community discussions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kakise@mlem.a-smol-cat.fr 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well, why not go back to BBS then ? I'd be happy to host a server

[–] modulartable@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

rubs hands together Oh yes, it's all coming together!

[–] rlhe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You put the tw2002 door on it and I’m so there!

[–] j4yc33@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OMG... we need a federated BBS.

[–] Borgzilla@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you mean a BBS that could communicate with the Fediverse via the Activitypub protocol?

[–] j4yc33@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was serious. Conceptually it makes a lot of sense to do, I've thought about a number of CLI clients, but like a federated BBS from someone with the experience to do it right would be... just... chef's kiss

I'm of the wrong era. I got the tail-end of using them and wasn't developing until well into the WWW days.

[–] Borgzilla@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not exactly what you're looking for, but someone wrote a TUI for Lemmy: https://github.com/mrusme/neonmodem

[–] kakise@mlem.a-smol-cat.fr 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see no reason why activitypub couldn’t work on Telnet tbh

[–] j4yc33@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Big oof... can't we use something better than telnet? ;)

[–] milano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

HUGE problem I see with using a BBS today is that telnet transmits in clear-text, which wasn't much of an issue when we were still using dial-up modems. Suppose BBS software can be adapted for SSH, but to go through all that, may as well host shell accounts on a *nix platform IMO.

Off top of my head I can think of 2 BBS software that use SSH.

In any case, I would be hesitant on using any BBS that I cannot use key-based authentication.

If determined on clear-text BBS.. may as well consider using Gopher instead of HTTP.. just a thought since we're pulling out the legacy protocols.

DOORs would def need to be a part of any BBS project.. can't imagine this would be that easy considering nearly all of them were DOS.