this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
222 points (92.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21304 readers
1289 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Finding out that t2linux is too broken was like finding out that Santa isn't real

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
    [–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    I prefer coreboots flexibility

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Not as free though. Also coreboot needs a distribution

    [–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    does it? I got the source from coreboot.org and compiled it myself.

    [–] smb@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    but you did notice that compilers can be manipulated to include backdoors into resulting binaries AND put the same manipulation into newly compiled compilers as well, right? then where did you get that compiler from? did you have a look at the binary output? then if so, did you look at it using the hexeditor of that same compiler? 😎 plz have a look .. 💥 bzzzt ... really you are lucky to be alive after a blast like that, especially you, have yourself checked out with ems before you leave!

    [–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    I looked at it by inspecting my hdd with a microscope. is that good enough?

    [–] smb@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    with a microscope

    if it was at least a scanning tunneling one, then yes, good job 👍 🤪

    [–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Uhm.. My microscopes firmware was compiled with the same compiler I used for coreboot..

    [–] smb@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

    yeah! you beat me to it 👍

    guess this instance is lost, lets restart the matrix!

    https://youtu.be/rNdpvNH1yi8?si=GPLbzrNxnwKNCfHm