this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
567 points (92.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26661 readers
4201 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I can hear this post in their voices. Maybe I’ve seen the movie too many times…nah

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You haven't disproved anything. The common understanding of multiverses typically only extends to livable multiverses, but there are infinite multiverses capable of sustaining logic and organization, just as there are infinite universes of junk data.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have disproven that an infinite set necessarily contains every arbitrary possibility. And quite simply, too. Notice how the set of natural numbers does not contain any grapes.

Thus, the burden of proof is now on those who claim they do know what is in the multiverse. Such as yourself. What evidence do you have for these “junk data” universes?

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to blow your mind with a simple bit of logic. IF the junk data universes don't exist, then the multiverse isn't infinite. Order is an infinite subset of disorder.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you learn that from a fortune cookie?

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is the universe infinite if there's something missing?

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The set of natural numbers is infinite. The number 2.5 is missing from that set. Therefore infinite sets do not contain every possibility.

It's not rocket science

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're talking about countable infinities vs uncountable infinities, but you're proving my point. Order is a countable infinity, disorder is an uncountable infinity. You've just abstracted yourself into a corner.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sigh, very well then.

Consider the set of real numbers, which is an uncountable infinity. Notice how this infinite set does not contain any grapes.

It's not rocket science

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Grapes and real numbers are both finite distinctions of a shared infinitely ordered set, which itself is part of an infinitely disordered set. Numbers are an infinitely ordered set that do not contain grapes. Grapes are part of many finite sets that are also part of an infinitely ordered set. Both exist within disordered and ordered sets as well. You're not describing limitations of the infinite like you think you are. You're only describing the limitations of your understanding of the infinite.

[–] CaptainEffort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exactly this. I think the real problem is that “infinite” is virtually impossible to comprehend, so people regularly misunderstand what it means and how it works.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They're slippery concepts to be sure. Language itself becomes an impediment when discussing the subject. How can one use terms which were created to narrow perspective in order to expand consciousness to encompass the ineffable?

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, yes, obviously different infinite sets have different contents. Do you have a point that's actually relevant to what we're talking about?

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, no more points to make with you. You've missed every point I've made so far, so to continue would be a waste of time.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably for the best. Thanks for your…unique…contributions to the discussion!

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Carry on with your anthropocentric ideations I guess.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow you really saying random words lol

[–] Vulwsztyn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You were far more patient with this discussion than I am.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ha, thanks. Hopefully one day bro finds the plot