this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
358 points (97.6% liked)

> Greentext

7547 readers
661 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] piranhaphish@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I disagree on the comment about cost disparity. Spec'd equivalently, even the Framework 16 (without GPU) is no more expensive than the smaller ThinkPad X1 Carbon. The more comparative Framework 13 even less so.

The modular ports (and GPU on the 16) are a nice bonus, but I agree that the largest attraction is for the tinkerer.

I think the fact that it is easily upgradable makes it a clear winner on the merits alone.

[โ€“] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did a price comparison three years ago when I was exploring laptops and the price for a Framework was really high. Like it was cheaper to buy a used laptop every three years for a decade before I break even on a Framework high.

I'm not knocking it at all. It just the cost is so high, and they don't have the means to produce where the price is at a consumer level.