A decision at the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) was recently released. The Order states that the LTB has the authority under s. 202 of the RTA to pierce the corporate veil in a much more expensive manner than permitted by common law.

Is it purely advisory or does it have some teeth? Have their been any cases where the constitution has affected the outcome of a court decision?

A lot of people learn about the legal system from what they see on TV and movies. Since a lot of that content is American, what are some relevant differences that stand out to you?

Hi everyone,

As this community gets going, we will need moderators with experience in the legal world. If you want to help out, let me know.