No, but the court says you can't question the president's motive when they say it was an official act.
zbyte64
joined 9 months ago
"We made some bad bets, anyways, here some layoffs"
Obviously they should have trained the AI on text from John Edwards' Crossing Over. /s
But seriously, I worry when one of these hacks figures out how to make the word multipliers approximate a cold reading.
I must've missed that announcement at the last antifa meetup.
What intern is going to give Biden a blow job?
"Whatever the Supreme Court says is legitimate" is a different sort than "systems that don't deviate from serving their purpose are legitimate"
Not a fan of the article throwing leftists and activists under the same bus with the Democratic party. Also rich how the author claims activists aren't acting like it is an existential threat but they are dumb for not endorsing Biden.
The coffee: Folgers
Thing is, this tool the SCOTUS has given the POTUS only works for fascists. Even if Biden did house arrests it would likely blow up in our face.
What a can of worms. If Texas can ignore SCOTUS then with this ruling what's to stop the president from ordering his staff to do the same?
That's originalists for you.
Imagine picking a Democratic candidate that can't even handle the bullshit from fox news and then acting all surprised when his polls start to tank.